mcarr1973
Posts: 7 |
Wow you guys should check out CrazyBump its an amazing program..
Pleas all Mac users ask for a mac version. |
|||||
Posted: January 4, 2009 12:53 pm | ||||||
StevieJ
![]() |
Spaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!
![]() Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||||
Posted: January 4, 2009 10:01 pm | ||||||
GMM
Moderator
Posts: 3491 |
StevieJ, why would you call this spam? Looks like CrazyBump is a texture rendering program.
|
|||||
Posted: January 5, 2009 5:08 am | ||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
It's a very nifty app for sure, and there's currently a beta version available on the forums for some free testing...
![]() --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||
Posted: January 5, 2009 5:25 am | ||||||
StevieJ
![]() |
Well, I could be wrong.....but it seems like a "plug" to me..... Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||||
Posted: January 5, 2009 2:09 pm | ||||||
CorvusCroax
![]() |
Actually, Crazy Bump is a pretty awesome program. What it does is allow you to take a regular old shaded photo, process it, and magically generate a normal map, a bump map, a diffuse (ie shadow removed map), an ambient occlusion map, and even specularity information.
This is sort of like a magical machine which takes omlettes and converts them to eggs, tomatos, sausage, and butter. Example: ![]() Here's the source link: http://crazybump.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=117 |
|||||
Posted: January 5, 2009 7:30 pm | ||||||
Mike Blackney
![]() |
And it works very well hand-in-hand with FF
![]() |
|||||
Posted: January 5, 2009 8:59 pm | ||||||
Skybase
![]() |
Crazy Bump is handy! I worked with it back when I was working at a studio and I needed some ultra-bumping effect from a photograph. Before Filter Forge, I was basically taking photographs of textures in varieties of areas which I made them seamless using a program which I programmed myself.
One of the problems was that I had the source but I did not have the depth field (in other words I did have X and Y but not Z. I remember having to actually make a very similar program that did worse compared to Crazy Bump. Either way, I used the lighting patterns and also heavily used the highpass process to gain the bump maps I wanted. BUT when Crazy Bump came out I was awed. I bought it and I used it crazy for all of my texture projects for my studio. ![]() |
|||||
Posted: January 8, 2009 10:06 am | ||||||
Beliria
![]() |
looks interesting.. might add it too my list of software to check out
![]() Nothing wrong with a little insanity ;)
|
|||||
Posted: January 9, 2009 5:23 am | ||||||
ronjonnie
![]() |
I have to admit, it does look cool. So many great software programs out there,
but for now, I am enjoying Filter Forge, I haven't seen a more cool fun program yet! ![]() Have a GREAT weekend everyone! ![]() Ronjonie zazzle.com/Ronspassionfordesign*
So much to learn, so little time. |
|||||
Posted: January 10, 2009 4:05 pm | ||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
Yup. However, $300 for the commercial license feels a bit too pricey in my book when comparing price vs. feature-set. ImageSynth for example is comparable to Crazy Bump in the feature-set/capabilities department, and its $99 price-tag seems much more reasonable. Then again, the CrazyBump developer does know how to milk game studios for what they're worth, and the price tag certainly reflects that. ![]() There's also ShaderMap for those tight budget folks. Haven't looked into it yet, but it looks useable. --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||
Posted: January 12, 2009 6:27 am | ||||||
Beliria
![]() |
strange I was thinking about that program this morning.. think I might aim for getting that unless someone can figure out how to do something similar with FF ![]() Clicked the link for shadermap and see what you mean about more affordable!! Will have a look when I get some spare time as well. Nothing wrong with a little insanity ;)
|
|||||
Posted: January 12, 2009 12:55 pm | ||||||
CorvusCroax
![]() |
Huh, I've never heard of ShaderMap. Thanks for the tip! Hey, it's only 20$.
I think ImageSynth more of a texture-maker / intelligent combiner? Like, you take 2 photos and it makes a tileable, coherent texture out of it. (I have an Art Director friend who swears by it, btw.) Crazybump is more like extract bump, diffuse, and normals out of a regular photo. Both are pretty useful... |
|||||
Posted: January 12, 2009 2:33 pm | ||||||
CorvusCroax
![]() |
Yeah, the specialized pro tools are expensivo, no doubt about it. But, if you have a great tool which can save you hundreds of hours of staff time, $300 can seem like a bargain. These guys have no excuse, though, IMHO! |
|||||
Posted: January 12, 2009 2:38 pm | ||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
I should have made my statement more clear. What I meant was that ImageSynth and CrazyBump are comparable in the 'breadth' of their functionality, not that they're identical in functionality.
Wasn't that ryan's argument for defending the CrazyBumo price tag? ![]() ![]() --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||
Posted: January 12, 2009 5:43 pm | ||||||
James |
Yeah i actually saw ShaderMap the other day before reading this thread they basically seem to do the same thing but ShaderMap is a much nicer cost.
![]() |
|||||
Posted: January 13, 2009 9:45 am |
Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!
33,712 Registered Users
+19 new in 30 days!
153,534 Posts
+27 new in 30 days!
15,348 Topics
+72 new in year!
5 unregistered users.