Messages 46 - 90 of 125
First | Prev. | 1 2 3 | Next | Last |
ChrisP
![]() |
Beliria, I just added this below your comment on Xstreet:
"I use Filter Forge too and can confirm that all of the textures here were designed by Beliria & not you. These textures (along with all of your others here) seem to have been copied directly from the Filter Forge website, so I've no idea how you "elaborated" them because they are identical to those on the website." |
|||||||
Posted: February 14, 2009 9:36 am | ||||||||
Beliria
![]() |
![]() Thanks ![]() Nothing wrong with a little insanity ;)
|
|||||||
Posted: February 14, 2009 9:50 am | ||||||||
jffe |
----There's no difference between that (above) and grabbing the demo and rendering them out. ----Ya'll just don't want to face it, once it's in the library, then it's public domain. FF is not going to commit "business suicide" and say the library filter presets can't be rendered out and sold. It's N-O-T going to happen. And, even if their EULA said that, they're not going to waste time chasing people selling them for $5 here and there (and I'm not either, I just quit submitting anything I intend to sell myself, same as you should). jffe Filter Forger |
|||||||
Posted: February 14, 2009 11:57 am | ||||||||
James |
I agree, although i know people selling presets would not stop just the ones selling saved images from the website, they could do the same thing with a copy of FF though but at least they would have to render it then. I think watermarking the images is a good idea untill a new EULA happens if it ever does.
Well you are right in ways, untill something is done once someone submits to the library it's not their own anymore other than the fact they know they made it. I don't plan submitting another filter or even images without tags here untill a new EULA happens, freeloaders have ruined a perfectly decent apps community as far as im concerned and it's up to FF devs to correct the problem. High ranked merchants would make that or more for a single pack plus the higer the exposure they are given the more quantity of sales they get, it's not really just a matter of the amount of money though at the end of the day. They have ruined the community trust and the quality of the library also and it's happening more and more. I don't see anything happening with the new EULA however sadly but i hope it hasn't been given up on. |
|||||||
Posted: February 14, 2009 12:55 pm | ||||||||
jffe |
----Nope. They may have slowed the growth of the library down a bit, but overall it is expanding at a decent rate, and there's still an editor's pick every month. The whole "trust" thing, has to do with maybe 3-4 over zealous folks like yourself. By way of making things known, you just create more problems by raising awareness (when there is no democracy here, there'll be no vote, Vlad decides, and obviously already has for a year or more simply by not changing things). I learned a bit of that lesson a year ago or so, ie = one of the first times this un-merry-go-round did a circle. ![]() jffe Filter Forger |
|||||||
Posted: February 14, 2009 1:47 pm | ||||||||
James |
Lol, no it's expanding all right but with lots of 1 preset/quick made filters. A few decent ones from time to time yes, i never said there were not still good ones but the general quality is going down hill and the quantity is increasing no doubt in hopes of a free copy with mods of previous ones adding to the samey/similar thing you see with FF. Hmm so you think it's my and others fault because we post our view, if there was a good EULA in place though there would be no problem. It's not a bad thing making it known anyway, after all not everyone reads deep into text when they should and maybe they wouldn't like it later when they found their work being sold yet they could do nothing so maybe it saves FF angry user threads. Personally i think someones own work belongs to them so if you think FF should be about tricks and hide the fact that theres no protection really then whatever. I didn't start this thread or the other main ones and people will continue to make them here and other places untill things get changed EULA wise. If anythings breaking trust it's the EULA not being fixed so you can try to twist it as much as you want but people will find out anyway sooner or later. ![]() And yeah it is going round in circles probably because the library is still going without a decent EULA and people notice the textures they made being sold. It's a problem caused by the fact it's based around a user library yet the textures they make are not really theirs, this will never work really unless the creator has some form of control over a creation they have made, hence the suggested EULA. |
|||||||
Posted: February 14, 2009 3:27 pm | ||||||||
jffe |
----Making it seem worse to yourself and the very people here who care, yes, that is the fault of those who hang on to one side when the other is the majority. Doesn't make it wrong, but it is your fault/battle.
----I've lectured the FF masses (all 8 or so of them ha-ha) to death about protecting their work and what copy"rights" mean in real-life/at ground zero. I was as bad or worse than you a year or two ago. I got over it. Some people will take the time to learn, the rest will just complain and wish things were some other way. Ie= people will "twist" things in their head in whatever direction, me and a few other's pointing out the facts of the situation, don't seem to slow them down much ha-ha. Then again, the majority of grown ups still believe in gawd, and not the fact-based theory of evolution, so yeah, case in point. ----If you think it's important, please do continue to speak out. But for the sake of those of us who actually read these forums, maybe mix it up once in a while. Like new idea time, and feel free to tell Stevie the same might help for his cause(s), although his ideas have at least gotten a bit more complex, the complaints are still the same, and FF is still ignoring them. Peace, jffe Filter Forger |
|||||||
Posted: February 14, 2009 3:38 pm | ||||||||
James |
Well both sides for and against bring it to light everytime they reply to each other. It's not my fault at all or either sides, if anything it's not having the correct EULA from the start of things. By posting things that are bound to get a reaction means your carrying it on also so welcome to the club. ![]()
I will continue to speak, and i have many ideas, the general theme is always the same though isn't it (EULA) and nothing is changing with it. I have already suggested things to fix it like a commissioned stock set or the EULA to start from a certain point then just leave the old library ones as is as it's too late in now. As well as lots of other things, theres not too much to be mixed up though really unless your hoping i post the plans for a time machine to travel back and fix it from the start ![]() |
|||||||
Posted: February 14, 2009 3:57 pm | ||||||||
Amethyst
![]() |
Guys, it is time to let this EULA thing rest. It has been going on for years and years as far as I can tell and it is really not pleasant for newcomers to the site to see this sort of thing going on all the time.
There is little to excite the old timers in the library because of the simple fact that there are now thousands of filters in the library already and perhaps the limited tool set we are all working with has been exhausted. Hopefully the new version will bring new things to play with and we will all be able to make something a bit more unique. However, in a year or two time we will once again be complaining that it has all been done already.
James, as time goes on and filter forge becomes more known, more and more newcomers are using filter forge. The filters they produce are perhaps not as advanced as you would like but they are a valuable contribution to the library. I am sure not all the old timers were fantastic in their early months with FF. Besides, what you hate, another person may love. I know there are many 'unique' filters in the library that I have absolutely no use for and it would be a shame if that was all there was in the library. Also with all the scare mongering going on, it is really surprising that people do not want to contribute more than one preset? These forums will help in the success or failure of Filter Forge and at the moment some of the input is certainly not going to help it succeed. ![]() |
|||||||
Posted: February 14, 2009 4:46 pm | ||||||||
James |
Well it's just my view i guess about the recent quality of the library, theres still stuff i like but a lot i just pass by. I don't want to put off newcomers at all but perhaps uploading the very first things is not always the best thing to do. But as you say what doesn't interest me another might like and what i like another may not etc. The scare/fear mongering come from the fact that people find their work or lots of library stuff on stock sites etc so it's likely if it's good their work will follow the same path, so possibly all caused by the EULA itself. In terms of success or failure it's all down to FF really, not letting someone have control of the work they make is always going to cause problems. I want FF to have success just like a lot of others here but they really aren't helping themselves not updating the EULA. |
|||||||
Posted: February 14, 2009 5:35 pm | ||||||||
Amethyst
![]() |
Yes, and that is why I have put my textures found at the site mentioned in the first post on ShareCG and posted them to some sites I think people will find a use for them. If they can get them for free then the person who is selling my textures is not going to make much money. This guy seems to have taken the images from this website and this has nothing to do with the EULA but with the following which is part of the terms of using this website:
This person ignored this. I doubt he has Filter Forge at all as he did not seem to know much about Filter Forge in his response to Beliria so the EULA would not affect him. I could go to a great deal of trouble to try to stop him selling my textures but for one dollar or so it is not really worth it. My solution is just to offer my textures for free and to get people to spread the word that they are free. Then hopefully he/she will not sell any of my textures in SecondLife in any case. ![]() |
|||||||
Posted: February 14, 2009 6:33 pm | ||||||||
James |
Thats a good idea but theres always the case they find his pack and buy before finding the free one later on ![]()
As you say it's not worth going to too much trouble for a $1 pack but it's not just this person and many others do it also at different prices, which is why i think a new EULA is a good idea and also watermark previews because it stops all of this, but it would only work with future created textures really. On other sites i have seen packs as high as $19.99 with say 20-30 textures at 1024x1024 with just default stuff or slight color changes each render. If they have a decent pc it doesn't take too long to render at that size. Sharing them for free is a great idea and should work if they are found but the internet is so huge they might not always find the free pack first sadly. But hopefully they find the free pack before and don't buy the textures or better yet find FF and all the filters ![]() |
|||||||
Posted: February 14, 2009 7:38 pm | ||||||||
Mike Blackney
![]() |
I feel sorry for anybody who pays for something they could get for free.
Apart from that, scumbags like this Siberian guy/group don't bother me all that much. There are much worse things they could be doing. |
|||||||
Posted: February 14, 2009 8:58 pm | ||||||||
jffe |
---Word.
----Double word ?
----Triple word ?? ![]() jffe Filter Forger |
|||||||
Posted: February 14, 2009 9:20 pm | ||||||||
StevieJ
![]() |
Sounds like you are playing Scrabble, jffe.....
![]() ![]()
Well, my only "cause" is to see this program be successful so it will be enhanced for my own use.....and yes, I'm doing it for a selfish reason..... ![]() ![]() ![]() I may be wrong, but by the way things look to me, I think FF is going to have to start addressing author protection and incentives sooner than later. Vlad will probably give Craig and Dilla credit for making the suggestions ![]() ![]() Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||||||
Posted: February 15, 2009 12:03 pm | ||||||||
Revoye |
I've known some people that don't want to buy FF simply because they can "just use the sample images."
I think watermarking the images would be unattractive.. but I'm sure it could help FF sales. People think that the sample images are fair game weather they own the program or not. If FF even put a small watermark people may get the clue that this really isn't a free texture library. Also, I can't imagine those that texture sellers in second life are making very much money. I think most people steer clear from those kinds of shops because many (almost all?) of them just resell images they snatched from a web and maybe changed the color a little. There are a ton of scam shops on second life.. Luckily most of them are pretty obvious (horrible presentation/lots of words like "professional" "high quality" "original" etc etc) |
|||||||
Posted: February 15, 2009 10:44 pm | ||||||||
James |
I don't know about second life texture stores making much but i know the actual SL program/world is very popular. I think if they have a lot of people visiting all the time they no doubt get lots of traffic. For some reason people go for cheap buys even when they don't need things and with the right traffic then things like that can sometimes make a lot more money than higher priced packs.
I doubt they do make that much though but im sure they make some. For right clicking and saving a image then uploading it again with a title even them making $50-150 a year would still be a slap in the face to FF filter creators imo. Add a backhand in for good measure considering they uploaded for free most likely to share/learn from in the first place. As far as i see it no matter what resolution, site or however pro looking the package is if they did nothing but render or save presets and sell it's all the same. |
|||||||
Posted: February 16, 2009 7:05 am | ||||||||
StevieJ
![]() |
I agree.....and would be unnecessary with the new EULA restriction.....
That's the "big" misconception about all this.....the proposed new EULA restriction will only prohibit reselling straight texture results.....all other uses will remain completely unaffected by it. In other words, it will not affect 99.99% of customers who purchase this program for creative use..... Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||||||
Posted: February 16, 2009 12:46 pm | ||||||||
James |
It sounds like Revoye means they won't buy FF because they can simply download the sample images from the FF website StevieJ.
It seems people think the whole library is open to everyone even without owning but thats not the case. People think it due to the online library and the word free everywhere im guessing plus the fact theres not really any restrictions on using others work. |
|||||||
Posted: February 16, 2009 3:07 pm | ||||||||
StevieJ
![]() |
Oh, Excusy..... ![]() ![]() Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||||||
Posted: February 16, 2009 4:09 pm | ||||||||
capnsparrow
![]() |
![]() In fact... guess how I found out about FF in the first place? I did a Google search for "free textures". Then I found out I could create my own filters to make my own totally unique textures... and then I saw the price of the software, and realized I could NOT afford it. Then... I got sucked in by a promise of a way to get the software for free. I worked every waking hour during the time of my demo version (sometimes 16 hours a day or more), to learn the in and outs of how this software worked... and NOT ONCE have I ever used another person's work to create any part of my own. And at the end of my demo period... I had NOT ONE SINGLE HIGH USAGE RANKING. It has been nearly 3 YEARS since I first came across FF, and I got an email to tell me I got my 3rd HU... and now it appears I may as well stick it in my ear, because my free version will become non-functional next time there is an upgrade. MEANWHILE... IN SECOND LIFE... I have found at least FIVE shops selling textures either made with my filters, or simply someone's copying and subsequent upload into Second Life of the images for the presets straight off the library here. As to people's questions of whether these people are making any actual money, ie... some kind of significant amount in terms of real life US Dollars... uh... yeah... the aforementioned "Textures R Us" location in Second Life is huge... I dont know how anyone can even look through the entire shop there... and the owner of this shop, as far as I know, does not even create any of the textures for sale there herself... and yet claims to make $7,000 US DOLLARS PER WEEK selling textures in Second Life. Yes.. most other merchants in Second Life do NOT make this sort of money (unless it relates to virtual sex... but that's another can of worms). However... the one thing EVERY OTHER CONTENT CREATOR within Second Life needs to create truly marketable products is... you guessed it... TEXTURES. Without textures, everything you make via building tools is rendered in a default 'plywood' texture... hardly attractive. Clothing is another subject and not really relevant to this discussion. My point is: yes... for all intents and purposes, once submitted, filters are really NOT protected. And... here's the real kicker: these merchants within Second Life... and I'm sure some outside of Second Life, such as those mentioned at Renderosity... are CLAIMING COPYRIGHT to the output results of YOUR FILTERS. (Incidentally... not long ago, there was a huge stink between Renderosity and a Second Life 'skin' maker... wherein Renderosity claimed this merchant in Second Life was pirating content from the Renderosity site... heh) I don't know why I'm rambling here... but this has been eating at me for 3 years now... and I really don't care if these people are making pocket change or not... it's still MY CREATIONS that are bringing it to them... and I haven't been able to make a thin dime... because I COULD NOT EVEN USE MY OWN FILTERS all this time. All I wanted from the start was a way to more easily create textures for my own use in my 3D artwork... and instead I am now here rambling this tale. All I ever wanted was a functional texture creation tool, for a price I could afford, which didn't expect me to pay upgrade fees every time I turned it on. What I got was 2 months of nerve-wracking burning of the midnight oil, and 3 years of watching everything I made get used by others while I couldn't even run the software anymore.... and finally the icing on the cake, seeing the results being sold within the virtual world I enjoy so much... taking just a little of that enjoyment right out of me. In summary: yes... if considerably better copyright protection were offered, I might think of cashing in my 3 HUs and submitting filters once again... but until then, I guess I'll have to wait for the next 2 HUs... because the option for the 4th HU is useless to me... and without the 5th, my copy could become useless next time the software is upgraded... and I don't care to start this entire process over at the beginning. ![]() Okicyapo |
|||||||
Posted: March 12, 2009 10:33 am | ||||||||
Amethyst
![]() |
This sounds like me except the demo period is only 30 days now. I spent all of my Christmas break learning how to make filters and did little else except experiment and learn as much as I could in that limited time. At the end of this period I had a choice of never using my filters for the texturing work I originally wanted it for or buying a copy of FF. I bought a copy of FF in the end even though I thought it was very expensive for what it did, especially with the exchange rate being so poor here at the moment. I do not mind registered users of FF using my filters to create textures for themselves. However, I do take exception to people just coming here to take the previews from the website. The library on the website is advertised all over the internet as a free texture resource and I do not wish to add to this free resource. Consequently I will not be adding any more filters unless the previews are marked with a watermark to prevent people from just downloading the raw images. I think the library on this website is the cause of many of the problems people here are moaning about and the people selling straight filter textures are not even legitimate Filter Forge users which is why they are not adapting any of the filters for their own use. ![]() |
|||||||
Posted: March 12, 2009 11:52 am | ||||||||
StevieJ
![]() |
Don't get me going.....
![]() I would suggest requesting demo time extensions from FF towards getting the 5 extra HUs for lifetime updates of the program. FF has given up to two extra 30-day extensions in the past......for a total of 90 days with the demo..... ![]() Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||||||
Posted: March 12, 2009 12:27 pm | ||||||||
jffe |
----Not to rain even more on your parade, but it's 3 HU's to get in, 5 more HU's for lifetime updates. jffe Filter Forger |
|||||||
Posted: March 12, 2009 1:28 pm | ||||||||
Amethyst
![]() |
I am not sure who you are talking to here but capnsparrow says she came across FF 3 years ago and I think her demo may have expired since then. I bought FF when my 30 days trial period was up. Knowing I could have extended it to 90 days and that other people do makes me feel ripped off too. ![]() |
|||||||
Posted: March 12, 2009 1:35 pm | ||||||||
StevieJ
![]() |
I don't blame you.....alot of people don't know that they can do that.....so I suggested that FF do something like this..... http://www.filterforge.com/forum/read...9&TID=6175 Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||||||
Posted: March 12, 2009 1:45 pm | ||||||||
Sjeiti
![]() |
No... it's just five HU's. Either that and you wasted three, or you are right and I got three for free. But I think it's just five and the getting filter forge for free page is just a bit confusing in their example. |
|||||||
Posted: March 12, 2009 5:32 pm | ||||||||
Kraellin
![]() |
that's from the getting filter forge for free page, sjeiti. pretty clear to me. and capnsparrow,
what the hell are you talking about? this is NOT true. i've had my free version since the original beta days and it has never become non-functional with any new upgrade. where do you get that sort of data? that's just b.s.
man, i dont know where you're getting your data from, but both of these items are incorrect. see the note on how many it takes to get a lifetime product key and why would anyone's copy become useless when a new upgrade comes out? that's like saying that photoshop cs2 would become worthless and quit working when cs3 came out. that just doesnt make any sense at all. If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||||||
Posted: March 12, 2009 10:02 pm | ||||||||
Sjeiti
![]() |
I've read that. But I can imagine that people then think what Jffe thinks: that you first have to spend three HU's to get FF and then spend five more to get the lifetime upgrades. But that's not true. The example just shows that you lose the points once you choose a reward. |
|||||||
Posted: March 13, 2009 3:21 am | ||||||||
StevieJ
![]() |
It does seem to read that you can redeem 5 points for lifetime updates if you haven't redeemed 3 points for a copy yet.....
![]() Good question to pose to FF....... Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||||||
Posted: March 13, 2009 3:43 am | ||||||||
Kraellin
![]() |
yeah, i see what you're seeing and i agree that that first part is ambiguous, but the example says to me that it's 3 + 5 no matter what. but, if one person has uncertainty about it, then there's sure to be more than one, so it shld probably be cleaned up and stated more precisely. that simple list is what's throwing everyone, i think.
but if you read it again, you'll notice that #5 states 'free lifetime upgrades'. it says NOTHING about getting the original version, the base. it ONLY says upgrades. so, to me, that says you are NOT getting the free copy plus upgrades for 5 HU's. i mean, how can you get upgrades if you dont have FF already? so, it's pretty clear to me that it's 3 + 5 = your copy + lifetime upgrades. i liken it to something like photoshop where you buy a full version and thereafter buy upgrades. but, if you're all still uncertain, why ask away at FF ![]() If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||||||
Posted: March 13, 2009 3:46 pm | ||||||||
jffe |
----Pretty much confusing and a rip-off in a way, no offense to FF since they offer anything free and all, but, if we assume each version upgrade is $99, then "lifetime" updates only pays off (in a mathematical way) on version 7 then if it costs 5 HU's by itself (considering 3 HU's gets you a $299 app, and assuming a version upgrade is $99). They really should *clarify* that, whether they change it or not is of course up to them. And I would assume that either 'side' here could be mistaken, as I got my original copy for free (no HU's needed) since I did the beta thing, submitted errors, filters, and just participated etc. So for me, it will cost 5 HU's total for lifetime updates, and I have no actual idea if it would've just asked for 2 more had I used 3 to get this original copy. jffe Filter Forger |
|||||||
Posted: March 13, 2009 4:01 pm | ||||||||
Sjeiti
![]() |
Oh wait... I was wrong...
![]() I was only thinking about the five points I spent, and completely forgot about the free copy I got for beta testing. I'm sorry for being confusing (I need a vacation)... it is 3+5 |
|||||||
Posted: March 13, 2009 4:53 pm | ||||||||
Kraellin
![]() |
vacation not granted. kindly submit three more filters as penance
![]() ![]() If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||||||
Posted: March 14, 2009 9:54 am | ||||||||
StevieJ
![]() |
They just changed this.....so FF must be listening to our rantings after all..... ![]() ![]() So, you're not crazy, sjeiti.....FF is just messing with your head..... ![]() Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||||||
Posted: March 14, 2009 10:29 am | ||||||||
capnsparrow
![]() |
Well... ignoring the fact that some of these comments stopped just short of calling me an imbecile (another reason I quit coming here)... yes... that "simple list" is EXTREMELY MISLEADING.
This is why, when you are sworn in as a witness in court, they say, "the truth, THE WHOLE TRUTH, and nothing but the truth". This "simple list" is not, in fact, the whole truth... and you have to look elsewhere to find out that your "free lifetime upgrades to all future versions" ONLY applies if you ALREADY have the full version in the first place. As for the question of whether my free version will continue working: why would I expect anything different from a source which has already misled me in the first place? It only makes sense that I would expect eventual cost upgrades to be mandatory and required for the software to continue functioning. If I seem mistrustful... well.. do you honestly think I don't have good reason? You really have no idea how much I feel like I got totally screwed by loopholes in the "open source" ideals in relation to FF... if you did, you wouldn't more or less call me stupid and an idiot... or maybe you would... All that matters to me is this: if I turn in my 3 HUs... can I continue to use my version of FF to create content for my own personal use, or will I, at some point, be forced into a mandatory cost upgrade? Beyond that, it doesn't matter to me, because I've already seen first hand on multiple occassions that content CANNOT be protected, so I have serious reservations about submitting anything further to the library until I feel confident there will be less abuse. ALL OF THIS is NOTHING PERSONAL to ANYONE OF THE USERS HERE. I was, at one time, very proud to be associated with you people. I just wish things could be changed to make a more cooperative atmosphere, and a less competitive one. I am a totally non-competitive person, and would rather avoid it always. Well anything further would just be rambling here... and a lot of this is off the subject of this thread. If you'd like to know more about places in Second Life selling textures of yours... I can name a few. Also... I have personally received emails over these years from users of Second Life, asking me about using my creations for sale inworld. I have declined, even though they were at least nice enough to ASK me about it... because I couldn't even use the software myself... and it just felt like another kick in the pants. Anyway... I guess I'm off to cash in my HUs and be done with this. Good luck to all of you. Okicyapo |
|||||||
Posted: March 14, 2009 3:36 pm | ||||||||
jffe |
----When the V2 upgrade happens, and assuming it does in fact cost to upgrade, you can choose to not upgrade and keep using V1. The only real downside is, no more new filters from the library, as any filters created with V2, will then not work in V1, but FF V1 itself will of course continue to function just fine. ----Surely you have used software that was upgraded to new versions, while you did not wish to continue paying for the upgrades, and the original version or level where you stopped buying the upgrades still works fine ? I have a buddy who runs Win98, and know several people using WinME, same kinda thing, the software doesn't care, it runs fine, you just can't do as much with it is all ha-ha. jffe Filter Forger |
|||||||
Posted: March 14, 2009 4:28 pm | ||||||||
James |
Personally i think the apps great but the plans around it didn't work, the biggest mistake basing it around the users work. The free deal should have been limited time yet it's still going strong with extensions on trials etc.
It kind of makes it all seem statistics driven. Hopefully the price of the upgrade when V2 happens won't go up the more filters added. Since i only usually use a few effects and textures as reference/learning of which most do similar things i would actually be less interested in the upgrade then. Im guessing other people will have made more from my filters by now than i would be paying to upgrade also ![]() I used 3 HUs but it seems that they stop counting after you use a reward or at least it slowed down after i did it. Also having to reset the count for something which can take so long to get is kind of pointless really. It should just add to the 3 already spent. |
|||||||
Posted: March 15, 2009 1:47 am | ||||||||
StevieJ
![]() |
I have to disagree.....gotta have a demo trial period.....especially for a program such as this.....
Well, that's going on "under the radar" with very few knowing about it.....which I think should be changed so everyone knows about.....like by saying something about it on home page so everyone sees it. I think stating that extra demo trial will be given to those who are showing a good-faith effort to submit quality works would only help get more people involved and "spread the word" more about this program. It would bring in alot more people to try their hand at it.....who might otherwise think that 30 days is too short to get anywhere with it. I also think that it would improve filter submissions from new authors by giving them more time to learn the program and submit better filters with less time pressure..... ![]() Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||||||
Posted: March 16, 2009 4:20 pm | ||||||||
Amethyst
![]() |
I had 30 days trial and it was just enough to learn how to make filters and to get hooked. I think the free trial is a necessity too. Without it I would have just opened it up and then forgotten about it. I ended up purchasing it after 30 days because I did not realise I could have gotten an extension.
Yes, I think that is really unfair to the people who try it out and then buy it after the 30 days like I did. It leaves me feeling ripped off when there are people here who have had extensions and never paid for the application at all. ![]() By the way, if I get 5 HUs do I have to rebuy the Pro version before I can get lifetime upgrades? I only have the standard edition because that is all I could afford with the present economic climate and the poor exchange rate (PLUS the 19% VAT added on top of the price when VAT here is only 15%) making even the standard version very expensive. |
|||||||
Posted: March 16, 2009 5:18 pm | ||||||||
StevieJ
![]() |
Yeah, another reason why they should be "open" to everyone about it.....because it has the potential to create bad PR from those who didn't know about it.....and end up feeling the same as you do now..... The only reason why they might not want to be open about it is that they think that it might cut into sales.....like with people like yourself who ended up buying it after the 30 day demo.....but I think the benefits would still greatly outweigh any possible loss in sales.....
Good question.....I think that turning in five HUs will get you lifetime updates of the version that you have.....so you might want to upgrade to the pro version before doing it. I would ask FF to absolutely sure..... Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||||||
Posted: March 16, 2009 5:47 pm | ||||||||
Amethyst
![]() |
Well, that doesn't seem fair either. I already have 2 HUs so if I had had an extension I could have perhaps gotten the application for free. Now it looks like I have to spend another 100 dollars to upgrade to the Pro version before I can get lifetime updates or else use 3 HUs to get basically what I have already but with the ability to render various maps. It looks like I am in a no-win situation because I was honest and purchased the application in the first place. ![]() It is not your fault, Steve but something is serious wrong here. Thanks for the help anyway. |
|||||||
Posted: March 16, 2009 6:07 pm | ||||||||
StevieJ
![]() |
I agree with you.....it's not fair to those (like you) who didn't know about being able to request demo extensions.....so I think FF should either be open about it with everyone or end it.....have to be "consistent" with everyone.....
In your case, I would suggest contacting FF.....explain how you would have approached this if you had known about requesting demo extensions....and ask them if they would upgrade you to lifetime updates of the pro version if you redeem just 5 more HUs. I can't speak for them.....but I think they might "accomodate" your situation.....especially given your ongoing involvement here..... ![]() ![]() Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||||||
Posted: March 16, 2009 6:21 pm | ||||||||
Kraellin
![]() |
amethyst,
with the quality of filter that you are producing, i have no doubt you'll earn enough for two pro versions plus lifetimes on each ![]() and frankly, i dont think anything about the free program is seriously wrong. how many other companies offer their software for free for contributing? it's pretty much unprecedented in the software industry, other than beta testing. and notices are posted all over the forums about the two extensions. i know i've answered several people on this subject. so, let's be thankful that FF, inc. has been as kind and generous as they have been, yes? If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||||||
Posted: March 16, 2009 9:57 pm | ||||||||
KGtheway2B
![]() |
About time someone got things straight here. |
|||||||
Posted: March 17, 2009 1:18 am |
Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!
33,714 Registered Users
+20 new in 30 days!
153,537 Posts
+6 new in 7 days!
15,348 Topics
+72 new in year!
18 unregistered users.