YOUR ACCOUNT

xirja
Idididoll Forcabbage

Posts: 1698
Filters: 8
[Bug] Pixel Flip

BugPixelFlip.ffxml
_____________________________________________________

http://web.archive.org/web/2021062908...rjadesign/
_____________________________________________________
  Details E-Mail
GMM
Moderator
Filter Forge, Inc
Posts: 3491
What's that? Should I move this thread to the "Creating filters" forum?

Saying "Bug" is not a bug report. At least one should explain what they wanted to achieve, what they got instead and how to reproduce it.
  Details E-Mail
Skybase
2D/3D Generalist

Posts: 4025
Filters: 76
It's straight up cryptic but from what I gathered flip isn't behaving as expected.

Pixel X + 1 divided by image source = gradient on the X axis of the image (values between 0 and 1). When feeding this into the flip node it should flip the gradient along whatever axis chosen. In the example, it should be flipping on the x axis (and another on on the y). However that doesn't happen.

So is this a bug or is this by design?
  Details E-Mail
xirja
Idididoll Forcabbage

Posts: 1698
Filters: 8
Right, flip doesn't flip when used in pixel logic.
_____________________________________________________

http://web.archive.org/web/2021062908...rjadesign/
_____________________________________________________
  Details E-Mail
xirja
Idididoll Forcabbage

Posts: 1698
Filters: 8
Because I first noticed this issue occurring with ONLY the Transform components, I posted five bugs. In addition to this one:

[Bug] Pixel Scale
[Bug] Pixel Rotate
[Bug] Pixel Offset
[Bug] Pixel Lookup

But, there are additional components that misbehave, such as the Elevation Gradient and Blur. Perhaps all the Processing components do. I am content with 7 bug points. smile:D

BugPixel_.ffxml
_____________________________________________________

http://web.archive.org/web/2021062908...rjadesign/
_____________________________________________________
  Details E-Mail
xirja
Idididoll Forcabbage

Posts: 1698
Filters: 8
Just checked 5.007 and this is still a problem.
_____________________________________________________

http://web.archive.org/web/2021062908...rjadesign/
_____________________________________________________
  Details E-Mail
Indigo Ray
Adam

Posts: 1442
Filters: 82
Already mentioned here. Although it is deceiving, it may be intended this way. Regular gradients are continuous, but Pixel X and Y are discrete. Or something like that. You can always use math to "transform" Pixel X and Y. For example: add=offset, invert=flip.
  Details E-Mail
xirja
Idididoll Forcabbage

Posts: 1698
Filters: 8
Thank you Indigo, the slight blur does it. But for flipping, for example, subtract nor invert don't work either, unless there is that slight blur attached.

So in my bug report defense, I say, Betis had [bug?] at the end of the title, whereas I declared [Bug] definitively at the start. Also, while his description was sufficient by GMM's standards, I provided the actual working examples of the problem.

Merry Christmas to me. smile:cry:
_____________________________________________________

http://web.archive.org/web/2021062908...rjadesign/
_____________________________________________________
  Details E-Mail
GMM
Moderator
Filter Forge, Inc
Posts: 3491
This is by design.
  Details E-Mail

Join Our Community!

Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!

33,711 Registered Users
+18 new in 30 days!

153,533 Posts
+38 new in 30 days!

15,348 Topics
+73 new in year!

Create an Account

Online Users Last minute:

30 unregistered users.