Turn off S, P, V, and R.

I strongly support this.

Quote
Quasimondo wrote: I strongly support this.

Thanks Quasi.

Quote
Vladimir Golovin wrote: Sounds good, and I even have an idea where to place this -- "Filter Properties..."

- Cool, but don't forget Vlad, that needs to be into the Filter Editor, so, final user can't "access"/change these options on the settings tabs or other place. The only way user will get to active on again will be editing and saving the filter again. Something like that.

Quote
(the settings that control the blending with the original picture will also be included there).

I think I didn't wake up yet. I didn't get that. Blending with orgiginal? What does it stand for?

Quote
However, the last one (Seamless) is problematic because everything in FF and on the website is based on an assumption that any filter can be seamlessly tiled. As we discussed in other threads, this leads us to a concept of non-seamless filters.

I didn't see this thread yet. Do you have the link to give a look? Well, if the author decides that it wouldn't be seamless, I think it would be allowed. Well, I need to check the thread 1st to see what was already discussed to get to give some opnion on it.

Time to embrace the concept of non-seamless filters Vlad. Its a brave new world.

Quote
uberzev wrote: Time to embrace the concept of non-seamless filters Vlad.

NO! NO! A THOUSAND TIMES, NO!

Donna

Quote
Whitedove wrote: NO! NO! A THOUSAND TIMES, NO!

I don't want to start yet another square-and-seamless-bashing thread - just stoke the fire a little more.....

Quote
>Our news:Since the day it was founded, the company has been focused on a single goal – "To develop the best Photoshop plugin on this planet, period."

(my underline)

If that had said "the best seamless square textile generator.....", nobody would be complaining - however, as advertised, it's difficult to reconcile the promise with the restrictions imposed.

This is meant to be constructive criticism, OK?

Rô