Crapadilla
![]() |
I hereby propose a new pattern component, the Radial Tiles! It would look much like the existing Tiles component...
... and it would produce an output as shown below. Tiles would be arranged along concentric circles/rings, the number of which the user specifies. Each tile would always maintain its rectangularity. The component would also automatically adjust the number of tiles distributed on each of the concentric rings so that there is no overlap among tiles. Note that regular pattern components can be spherified via polar coordinate transformation, but they do not retain their rectangularity (as can be observed in the Radial Mosaic Tiles filter). This is why a Radial Tiles component would be an important addition to the toolset. ![]() --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||
Posted: January 25, 2009 8:23 am | ||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
||||||
Posted: January 25, 2009 8:26 am | ||||||
Redcap
![]() |
I agree, we haven't had a new component since... since... since....
We haven't had a new component ever; at least since I have been using FF, always just bug fixes and updates and apple betas. It is almost like the FF team is busy or something ![]() Seriously though, amongst all the business, I would love to have a small morsel (such as a new component) thrown my direction. ![]() |
|||||
Posted: January 25, 2009 10:06 am | ||||||
ThreeDee
![]() |
Hey Dilla, u seen my Circular Tiling filter?
Certainly it would be way better if it was a component so as to be fast. TD |
|||||
Posted: January 30, 2009 4:02 am | ||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
Well, now I have... ![]() Nice work. If only we could find a way to have the number of tiles adjust automatically so that the grout area remains at a minimum even with a higher number of rings. ![]()
Indeed, but I can already feel the dreaded 'Aura of Parsimony' creeping towards this one, with some 'v2 Component Grouping Functionality' in its tow. ![]() --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||
Posted: February 1, 2009 12:35 pm | ||||||
Equator
Posts: 32 |
it would be nice!
|
|||||
Posted: January 8, 2011 12:31 pm | ||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
Yes, this would be a good new component and useful to have
Although this from you is very good uberzev, is true that would be better if this was made as a component inside FF |
|||||
Posted: August 18, 2012 3:46 am | ||||||
Skybase
![]() |
This is pretty specific usage.
It'd be better off suggesting a instancer or copy-stamper or duplicator or iterator or something along those lines. Those would be more global and would be applicable to more applications than having it draw only a circle or a couple other shapes. |
|||||
Posted: August 18, 2012 5:39 am | ||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
Ok, this is better and would be very good to have some kind of duplicator or iterator in FF as this is really needed for many things. Agree that would be more global and with more uses. But will FF include this kind of iterator/duplicator component in FF 4.0? |
|||||
Posted: August 18, 2012 9:54 pm | ||||||
Skybase
![]() |
Well, there are things you have to have before stuff like this works. The idea isn't so much to create a component but to create a environment that can accept feedback or looping capabilities (as far as I imagine.) The idea of feedback means to literally take the post node's results and feed it back into the beginning. So then it cycles through the same operations once again using the previous result. So it's more than just making radial tiles or shapes that stack towards the left or right. It can make fractals and radically complex shapes in a matter of a couple loops.
|
|||||
Posted: August 18, 2012 10:41 pm | ||||||
Morgantao
![]() |
Am I the only one who noticed uberzev never participated in this debate, yet he was magically quoted?
![]() Anyway, an itterator would be a very good addition to the toolset, and (among many other things) would let you make your this kind of radial tiling possible. But, as Skybase wrote, it's a bit tricky to add an iterrator component to the current toolbox, as you need to somehow group all the components you want to itterate, and for now at least, there's no grouping in FF (which would be usefull on it's own ![]() |
|||||
Posted: August 19, 2012 12:35 am | ||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
![]() ![]() Here is the right Quote:
|
|||||
Posted: August 19, 2012 1:24 am |
Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!
33,719 Registered Users
+8 new in 7 days!
153,545 Posts
+5 new last day!
15,348 Topics
+71 new in year!
26 unregistered users.