uberzev
 |
IMO the output should be Blue not Red...
 |
|||
| Posted: November 18, 2006 3:12 am | ||||
Lucato
 |
Yup, I have to agree that it's a little weird, but if you read the Help: Multiblend Component you will see that "Layer 1 is the bottom layer (the background), and the following layers are 'placed' over each other, with Layer 7 being the topmost (the foreground) layer"
I think the it would work different. I mean the layer 1 should be the topmost and 7 the background. Besides that, each layer in the Multiblend would also have the MODE (Darken, multiply, etc). Just my 2c. |
|||
| Posted: November 18, 2006 6:36 am | ||||
| Ken |
Hi.
Multiblend. Great idea for a component, thanks FF team. It should tidy our code up a lot. I do believe this component is working correctly as described.
However, this is not intuitive to Photoshop users. We are used to the background layer (layer 1) being at the bottom of the stack Please, please change the order so that layer 1 is at the bottom and layer 7 is at the top. +1 for layer blending mode on the top 6 layers. (not on the bottom background layer 1) Will this component work quicker than using several blends to achieve the same thing? Ken. |
|||
| Posted: November 18, 2006 10:29 am | ||||
| voldemort |
Thats a good question multiple blends seem to kill ff but My fiddling around with it seems to cause minimal impact but has anyone found any impact with its use compared to traditional multiple blends we have been using
lets all whine for a wine port |
|||
| Posted: November 18, 2006 10:44 am | ||||
Crapadilla
 |
Yup. The GUI on this component appears counter-intuitive to me as well. --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||
| Posted: November 18, 2006 11:16 am | ||||
Kraellin
 |
lol, shows you what i know. i didnt even realize there was a priority to the layers. i would have thought that with all of them at 100% you would have gotten a mix of all. ok, so learned something new
but, if you are going to change the order, change it quickly! i've already started converting filters to use this and if you reverse it some time down the road, all my presets are going to be whacko. frankly, i'm fine with it as it is. and VERY glad to have it. this will do wonders for some of my larger filters! craig If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
| Posted: November 18, 2006 11:16 am | ||||
|
uberzev
|
So can this component be fixed to work more like it does in Photoshop vlad? Its really confusing as it is.
|
|||
| Posted: November 23, 2006 3:27 pm | ||||
|
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator |
Yes it can
 |
|||
| Posted: November 28, 2006 10:52 am | ||||
|
Bella
Moderator
Posts: 274 |
We've eventually decided to leave the algorithm as it is. We've changed the interface instead - now Multiblend will look closer to how it works. Like this:
 |
|||
| Posted: November 29, 2006 3:52 am | ||||
|
uberzev
|
That's a little better, still weird though.
 |
|||
| Posted: November 29, 2006 3:55 am | ||||
|
Crapadilla
|
That's how I'd expect it to look as a photoshop user. Definitely better. --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||
| Posted: November 29, 2006 7:05 am | ||||
|
uberzev
|
 |
|||
| Posted: November 29, 2006 10:00 am | ||||
|
Crapadilla
|
With Layer 1 being the bottom and Layer 7 being the top layer (which is also shows correctly on the component in the default state), I don't see how this is upside down. It's roughly equivalent to a layer stack on the PS layers palette now, and logically correct. The 7th floor of a seven floor building is usually the topmost floor, no? --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||
| Posted: November 29, 2006 10:13 am | ||||
| Ken |
That looks much better.
But I think mine looks better still.
Ken.  |
|||
| Posted: November 29, 2006 12:59 pm | ||||
|
uberzev
|
 |
|||
| Posted: November 29, 2006 1:58 pm | ||||
Join Our Community!
Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!
33,711 Registered Users
+18 new in 30 days!
153,531 Posts
+39 new in 30 days!
15,347 Topics
+72 new in year!
Online Users Last minute:
26 unregistered users.
Recent Forum Posts:
- Kaleidoscopic Variations Vol. 2 by jhantares by jhantares
September 10, 2025 - Polygonal Images Set by Ramlyn by westdale
September 10, 2025 - FF Killing Resolution by SpaceRay
September 9, 2025 - Geometry Spinner by Rachel Duim by Rachel Duim
September 6, 2025 - Channel Glitch by Martin Naumann by SpaceRay
August 31, 2025 - Circuit Glitch by Martin Naumann by SpaceRay
August 31, 2025 - Groovy Rays by Ramlyn by Ramlyn
August 31, 2025 - Is Ultraforge dead? by dpankros
August 30, 2025 - Component Instances by AussieDecalf
August 27, 2025 - Hyperbolic Tiling Challenge by AussieDecalf
August 27, 2025 - Chaos Fields by SpaceRay
August 27, 2025 - New awesome TEXT component FF 14 - How to get the most of it? by SpaceRay
August 20, 2025
