YOUR ACCOUNT

Login or Register to post new topics or replies
jefflins
Posts: 4
Noob again...

What does the 3000x3000 bitmap size limitation mean? Is that for creating tiles? Or does that mean that a filter can't be applied to a picture larger than 3k x 3k?

I have a 12mpix camera, so does that mean I HAVE to get professional version of FF?

Thanks,
Jeff
  Details E-Mail
Kraellin
Kraellin

Posts: 12749
Filters: 99
a bitmap, especially when talking about a photo, is essentially the image size in pixels. so, if your camera takes 4000 x 3000 then yes, you'd need the more advanced version.

and to be more exact, a bitmap is any data that when arranged can be displayed as an image, is a bitmap. a photo, like a .jpg, is the bitmap (the actual data of the pixels) plus a certain amount of configuration details that tell something how to display the data. so, bitmap plus format data = a displayable image.

in the case of RAW, RAW is supposed to be JUST the bitmap data with no format information, though most companies doing RAW do put their own spin on things a bit, which is why photoshop and corel both have to include programming to read all the various types of RAW files. that was not what RAW was supposed to be about. it was supposed to be a standard format of just data, no compression and no oddball configurations. thus, the exact thing the camera sensor saw would be output in the RAW file with no alterations.

so, are you outputting RAW files or .jpgs from your 12 megapixel camera. and regardless, you can always rescale/resize the image down below the 3000x3000 limit, no?
If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!

Craig
  Details E-Mail
jefflins
Posts: 4
Thanks for the detailed response Kraellin.

I saw another post where the OP was complaining about the file size being too small that times have moved on, etc. I am a bit surprised that the conversation was evidently accurate, as I'd have to agree with that poster. So my option is really professional edition or nothing. Could I resize? that's simply not practical...and doesn't really make sense as I'd be throwing out photo information. Not sure I've ever seen a photoshop plugin where "throw out half your photo info first" was part of the deal.

Not that it will make a difference for me, but I wonder also if the limit is 9megapixels or 3000 pixels in any dimension...as a 2x3 aspect ratio would mean I'd have to scale down to a 6 megapixel image if the limiter is based on either dimension. I think...

So basically, for me, the only difference between standard and professional is that I can actually use professional LOL...I don't need the other stuff.

Ok, not that anybody asked the noob, but for potential photography based customers, that 9mpix limit doesn't seem like a great idea...basically saying, "oh, you have a newer camera? yeah, you have to pay more to use the software". If that's the intent, then fine. If on the other hand the intent is something else (creating bitmaps for a game or something) then this is a bad unintended consequence. My advice would be to raise the cap...flash forward 5 years where (unfortunately) no camera will be less than 9 mpix, and basic/standard editions become non-starters for photography based customers. Again, that's fine, especially if the vast majority of purchasers aren't in it for the photographic side of things.
  Details E-Mail

Join Our Community!

Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!

33,712 Registered Users
+18 new in 30 days!

153,537 Posts
+6 new in 7 days!

15,348 Topics
+72 new in year!

Create an Account

Online Users Last minute:

23 unregistered users.