Rawn (RawArt)
![]() |
I was recently hyping FF (as I am prone to do) and had two seperate instances of people saying they are not interested in investing in buying FF because they heard it may be going out of business soon.
![]() So i am wondering where they may have got that idea. Even if they are not, its not a good thing that there is a question like this hanging over them...it could really kill sales. Rawn |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 18, 2008 8:54 am | ||||||||||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
Out of business soon?! And where exactly did those people hear that unfounded rumor from?
![]() --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 18, 2008 9:00 am | ||||||||||||||
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator |
Well, that's definitely not the case. I'm also wondering where they got that idea. |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 18, 2008 10:12 am | ||||||||||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
My guess is that the heated EULA discussions here on the forums have left many people confused...
![]() --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 18, 2008 10:19 am | ||||||||||||||
Rawn (RawArt)
![]() |
I am glad its not the case(I didnt really think it was, cuz I m sure we would have known something from hanging out here so much LOL).....neither of them knew where they heard that rumour from (and I did press them LOL)....but somehow there does seem to be a rumour out there.
I was shocked to hear it, so I assured them that as far as I know FF is going strong and growing. It was just weird when it came from two totally seperate sources. All i could think is that people are maybe taking all that EULA talk going on here as a sign that things are up in the air and not solid.....but thats just a guess *shrug* Rawn |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 18, 2008 10:20 am | ||||||||||||||
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator |
Here's our traffic chart, since the release of the first beta. The first peak is the beta press release and announcements on CGTalk and everywhere else. The three sequential bumps some time after the release are caused by some of the early updates. The biggest peak is -- what else? -- Digg
![]() The point is, the graph shows a very stable linear growth. As for the EULA, I'm not done with it yet. There's one thing (I call it "Histogram Clause") that I'd like to add to the last revision of the EULA, but it's not yet ready for the prime time. ![]() |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 18, 2008 10:47 am | ||||||||||||||
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator |
BTW, nice thread title -- love it
![]() |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 18, 2008 10:51 am | ||||||||||||||
Rawn (RawArt)
![]() |
Thanx for showing that chart...looks like things are going fine
![]() As for the title...i hoped it would catch the eye...and now maybe people who are worried about those rumours will see it and see the responces as well ![]() |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 18, 2008 1:11 pm | ||||||||||||||
Kraellin
![]() |
yup, thanks for that, vlad. i know exactly where the rumor is coming from. it's coming from the forums here. there have been several threads that hinted at it. i tried to squelch it myself, but i just dont have the hard facts, so at best all i could do was provide circumstantial evidence.
i would reiterate, however, that getting the new eula done is pretty much the top priority right now. rumors abound in the absence of hard data. If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 18, 2008 1:36 pm | ||||||||||||||
jffe |
----Disclaimer, this isn't meant to be overly negative, it's just a question. That's a traffic chart, that has in a lot of cases, just about nothing to do with sales, does the sales chart look like that ? jffe Filter Forger |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 18, 2008 2:07 pm | ||||||||||||||
onyXMaster
Posts: 350 |
I really doubt that FF will go outta business soon. This unfinished EULA stuff on the other hand irritates even me
![]() ![]() |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 18, 2008 3:15 pm | ||||||||||||||
Sjeiti
![]() |
What's that giant peak in the chart? Is that Voldemort submitting filters?
![]() |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 18, 2008 4:03 pm | ||||||||||||||
Conniekat8 |
I doubt that a little controversy over EULA could take a company out of business, especially not one with a product this slick. Actually, sometimes a small amount of controversy is not half bad for advertizing.
And come people like to make mountains out of molehills. Even if it's a noisy molehill. |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 18, 2008 6:53 pm | ||||||||||||||
StevieJ
![]() |
Ah, so you are going to do it, eh??? The silence in the EULA strings had me thinking that you were abandoning it.....
Interesting.....but I need to see your sales chart..... ![]() ![]()
I would agree......but I don't know all there is to know behind the scenes here..... ![]()
Hope so..... ![]() ![]()
Alrighty......we have a man on the inside!!! ![]() ![]()
LMAO..... ![]() Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 18, 2008 11:31 pm | ||||||||||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
For a second there I was tempted to start a twin thread called "Is FF sinking in?"... ![]() ![]()
Exactly my impression. 'Slick' doesn't even begin to describe it... ![]() --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 19, 2008 4:25 am | ||||||||||||||
voldemort |
hmm looking at my calender and old posts I think that is about the time I actually said I was taking a break from FF ![]() lets all whine for a wine port |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 19, 2008 10:03 am | ||||||||||||||
voldemort |
Now for serious stuff I hate to say it --and it shows since is the first Ive said it to any one but the huge extent of offers and other stuff kind of struck me as a bit desperate like maybe sales might be suffering
the recent decline in submissions and new talent has worried me as well lets all whine for a wine port |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 19, 2008 10:04 am | ||||||||||||||
ssamm |
In my mind, I wasn't expecting sales (or traffic) to show much of an increase until after there was some sort of advertising binge (e.g. in computer art magazines?) But I think Vladamir or someone else from FF mentioned how advertising wouldn't be too efficient until they also had a Mac version -- which sounds reasonable to me...
|
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 19, 2008 11:47 am | ||||||||||||||
Kraellin
![]() |
the lack of a huge advertising campaign never worried me. FF is good enough that a word of mouth campaign is really about all it needs. graphic artists are always hungry for the latest and greatest and FF certainly fills that requirement
![]() If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 19, 2008 1:57 pm | ||||||||||||||
Conniekat8 |
Yeah... I was at loss for words how to properly describe it so I degenerated into dumbfounded "um, wow, how slick" ![]() In case anyone was curious, I found out aboutt FF by word of mouth, from my online 3D pals. |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 19, 2008 6:00 pm | ||||||||||||||
Conniekat8 |
About decline in filter submissions... perhaps some of it has to do with EULA thing, but I think more of it has to do with people realizing more and more that except for really talented few, it's not that easy to get HU points for a free copy. That marketing strategy probably worked a lot better when there were fewer filters overall.
In recent months there haven't been that many top filters de-throning tops of the charts. I'm not one of those peope that will ever have a thought that 'the top has been reached, there's no more cool filters to be made' I know in my personal case I was evaluating 'time spent trying to get good really fast and neglecting other things' vs. 300 bucks (or little less). I'm not an extraordinary talent, like Dilla or Constantine and few others, but with little work it wouldn't be impossible for me to get a few HU's. However, I couldn't justify the time. If I were on the inside (working at FF) I'd be brainstorming for some other incentive for people to attract talent to submit quality filters. (in addition to EULA adjustment). I've read commentary from other people that, paraphrasing: "most people whom are winning HU's are beta testers and people whom had more exposure to FF" - which I took with a grain of salt... But, there's always a little bit of truth in rumors. No I'm not believing for a minute that there's some sort of a rig, or behind the scenes conspiracy to limit people or prevent them from earning HU's. What would concern me that there is a segment of potential filter makers that end up feeling VERY discouraged. I'd wanna know how big that market segment is, and whether it would be worth while having other incentives to change the attitude and draw them in. I dunno, maybe monthly filter contests... maybe on a specific theme with various prizes. If I submitted a filter before EULA change because I wanted to share with other 'enthusiasts', and it was exploited commercially, I'd be ticked off. If I won a little prize for having a filter of the month... or one of the top 10 filters of the month... I may even decide to put some work into the filters and submit them in spite of current EULA. Anyway, blah blah.... |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 19, 2008 6:23 pm | ||||||||||||||
jffe |
----That makes sense in a way, in that those people have been using FF longer and know it better etc. Other than that, there are 2 really obvious reasons why fewer new people get HU's that I can think of. 1) there are now a days and every day now, more filters in the library as competition, and 2) new filter makers rarely *promote* them at all (for more info there, I defer to Stevie, king filter marketter extraordinaire ha-ha). #1 can't really be dealt with much, other to do unique/different stuff, and use the keywords to stand out when people do searches. #2 can be helped, a LOT, but rarely is done for some reason. Off the top of my head, I'd point to 2 of the 'newer' FF regs who jumped right in, and I know one of them got more than 3 HU's in less than 3 months, Sphinx and Mousewrites. They worked the system in that 2nd way (in addition to just being good creative filter makers), and they might very well have had more fun along the way too. ![]() jffe Filter Forger |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 19, 2008 6:30 pm | ||||||||||||||
Conniekat8 |
Yes, I hear ya!
Also, I think that additional small prizes ($25, $50 or $100) per month and sufficient amount of ego stroking just may work on a few more people (even without EULA changes). Giving away small prizes is really an inexpensive way of marketing. By making things revolve monthly, and only new submissions be elegible for that month's prizes (or some similar term) you create a monthly influx. By giving them themes and challenges, you entice even more people into participating (those which may be in a creative blank to come up with a theme of their own). I'm sure there's a finesse and legalities that need to be worked out to make something like that happen.. I'm sure FF has staff to do that. ![]() |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 19, 2008 6:41 pm | ||||||||||||||
Mousewrites
![]() |
Gotta be Sphinx; I have only 1 HU (old map) and a VERY NICE sponsor (Steve) who let me have some of his copious HUs to buy the full version. But I think you're right; filters are getting buried in the slow but steady trickle of new filters, and there's a Hard Core Few (compared to number of people using FF) that read and post in the forums regularly. Most of the HU All stars are active posters, are they not? People see their names and go 'hey, I know Dilla (for example ![]() Self promotion (name recognition, if you like) is as important as filter quality. (or at least, almost as important). This works against you, as well. If you make bad filter after bad filter, or are a real pest/troll (I don't think we have any trolls, do we?), people who read the forums are less likely to download and use your filter. The other problem some of us have is making very specific filters, in the hope that we 'wow' the FF community and get a HU. But making something that makes a Donut, or cereal (just to name a few of mine) isn't something that's going to get used a lot, and therefore, no matter how 'cool' it is, it's a one trick, average use pony. If we're going for HU, you have to figure out what people will actually USE. I love the ideas thread for that very reason. I'd love there to be some kind of 'most wanted' weekly post, with the best submission for that item getting a HU point. Basically like the contest, but with the FF people going "Hmm, we really need a ______ filter. We don't have any good _____ filters at all..." Ack. I'm being wordy. I'll shut my piehole. |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 20, 2008 10:10 am | ||||||||||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
They had been warned! ![]() ![]() --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 20, 2008 10:45 am | ||||||||||||||
Conniekat8 |
Sure they've been warned... I believe the whole point of the plan is to entice people to submit filters (not to give away Filter Forge), because FF people recognize the value of a large library with a significant number of quality filters (something that, for example Genetica doesn't have to this extent).
I'm not worried about people not paying attention to the fact that it's not easy to het HU's and a free copy. I'm concerned about that marketing strategy appearing to be on a decline in it's effectiveness in bringing in more filters. Which in part seems to gave given an impression that FF isn't doing so well. It's FFs' marketing people's job to steer the image of their company... and when there's increase in negative publicity, businesses tend to look into steering it into more positive waters. Also, for example (in my profession) you sort of have to take into the account that people won't pay attention to the fine print and that their behavior may not have a lot to do with common sense, and it's common business practice to try and cover yourself in as many of those cases as is reasonable. When it comes to disputes, In most courts professionals and companies are held at a little higher standard of behavior, ethics and general standards then their customers or public at large. Or to put it simply, on can't run a business based on counting on public at large behaving responsibly or in a common sense ways. If you could, there'd be no need for rules, regulations, disciplinary measures, drug testing etc etc... |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 20, 2008 12:00 pm | ||||||||||||||
jffe |
----Well, come on now, for any jawb that doesn't even pay double min wage, the drug testing is just to keep ye olde L&I insurance rates down. Fascism via responsibility laundering if you will. Kinda like how my state was one of the first to make car insurance mandantory (legally = required, otherwise $800 ticket), and not coincindentally, we also have a law that hospitals cannot refuse treatment 'based on ability to pay'. Anytime there's a *safety* put in place, you can bet it's gonna cost ya one way or another ha-ha. jffe Filter Forger |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 20, 2008 12:35 pm | ||||||||||||||
CFandM
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() Stupid things happen to computers for stupid reasons at stupid times! |
|||||||||||||
Posted: February 22, 2008 6:20 pm |
Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!
33,712 Registered Users
+19 new in 30 days!
153,534 Posts
+31 new in 30 days!
15,348 Topics
+72 new in year!
29 unregistered users.