stevedipaola
Posts: 21 |
Has anyone tried filter forge on the new intel i7 8 core processors ( 16 threads) or even the 6 core ones? Where they can report on the speed increase to say a typical i7 4 core machine ( most of us use). Is it 2x faster or less than that. Just curious how much the speed up is on a typical i7 4 core. To some of us, where paying for speed up of filter forge might be an option, it would be nice to know what kind of speed up you would get. I have access to a 6 core i7, ssd, 32 G Ram PC but my two copies of filter forge are on other machines.
|
|||||
Posted: December 15, 2014 7:12 pm | ||||||
GMM
Moderator
Posts: 3491 |
Speed increase on multi-core CPUs greatly depends on the filter itself. If the filter has many blurs, anti-aliasing and other bitmap-based stuff it won't scale linearly with more cores.
You can try the following: select your favorite filter, go to Tools > Options > Rendering > Use a single CPU/core. Render the filter using one core only, then set the value back to "Use all available CPUs/cores" and render the filter again. The difference in rendering time will give you the idea of how well this particular filter scales up. |
|||||
Posted: December 16, 2014 3:07 am | ||||||
GMM
Moderator
Posts: 3491 |
Also note that an SSD generally gives more performance increase than extra RAM.
|
|||||
Posted: December 16, 2014 3:08 am | ||||||
stevedipaola
Posts: 21 |
I did the test as GMM suggestion above, and with OCing ( overclocking CPU )
Used my home made filter on a 1350x860 res rgb image in photoshop/FF on win7 i7-2600k (4 cores) 3.4Ghz with ssd: test: time to complete: 1 core (GMM suggestions) 4 min 44 sec all 4 cores: 59 sec 4 cores w/ OCed @ 4.58 Ghz 45 sec so quite a difference between 1 and 4 cores, if I went with a 8 core cpu might double my speed. OCing helps but might not be worth the wear and tear on the computer. |
|||||
Posted: December 20, 2014 3:31 pm | ||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
I have been investigating much about this thinking to buy a cpu with more cores (6 or ![]() Here is a very good benchmark page to compare the CPU perfomance power and increase Primate Labs' processor benchmark chart with Geekbench 3 In this link here below Tom Hardware - Difference between 4 and 8 cores
Vladimir and GMM have told that FF has been optimized to be able to get all the power from all the cores you may have, BUT there is not yet any person that has put real benchmarks and render times with a 6 or 8 cores computer that are on the same CPU. There are some benchmarks on the forum with 8 cores made with 2 quad cores on the same motherboard but this is not the same, and I think that really it can´t be compared right. ALSO the number of cores is NOT always a measure of bigger perfomance, for example here is a comparison benchmark Intel Core i7 4770K (Quad Core 3.5 Ghz) vs AMD FX 8350 (8 Cores 4 Ghz) The Intel is hyperthreaded so it has another 4 virtual cores The Intel Quad Core 3.5GHz is faster in most benchmarks than the AMD Octa core 4GHz. And considering than an Intel 8 cores really has 16 cores (8 real and 8 virtual) |
|||||
Posted: December 22, 2014 10:35 am | ||||||
junkyjay
Posts: 1 |
Any possible way of looking into upgrading the rendering process to utilize a GPU?
More specifically on a Nvidia or AMD platform... |
|||||
Posted: December 28, 2014 1:26 pm |
Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!
33,711 Registered Users
+18 new in 30 days!
153,531 Posts
+36 new in 30 days!
15,347 Topics
+72 new in year!
29 unregistered users.