YOUR ACCOUNT

Login or Register to post new topics or replies
StevieJ
Designer/Artist

Posts: 11264
Filters: 163
Hi Everyone smile:) , I just had some thoughts of how Filter Forge could expand its market, make alot more money, and give ultimate added incentive for its filter makers....

IDEA #1: After a filter developer has attained a marketable assembly of filters, offer his/her filters in a 8bf plugin package to the public. For example; "Stacy's Texture Emporium by Filter Forge". Filter Forge would retain all rights and give 'Stacy' a pecentage of sales. This would;

1) Make more money by expanding Filter Forge's market to reach into all other imaging software without dealing with compatability issues.
2) Make more money by bringing in new customers from other imaging software....who like the filter packages and want more.
3) Give an ultimate reward of profit sharing and public recognition which would surely enhance continuous incentive for all FF filter developers to keep creating new and improved filters.

IDEA #2: Enhance Filter Forge with a 3D environment to tap into the game developers and CADD users. The gamers would be in heaven with 3D texturing....and CADD users (AutoCAD, Microstation, etc.) would love the ease of creative ability and texturing options to develop exactly what they envision for import into their 3D renderings. I use AutoCAD and this would be a godsend for photo-realistic 3D rendering....

Steve
Steve

"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :)
  Details E-Mail
Kraellin
Kraellin

Posts: 12749
Filters: 99
hi steviej,

in all probability, someone down the line is going to write a 'convert FF filter X into an .8bf' program. because of the type of language xml is, it probably wouldnt be that difficult to do. xml is a data writing and defining language. since the data is already there in every filter, some bright person is quite liable to take advantage of this. so, you simply plug the data of the filter into .8bf parameters and voila', intstant plugin.

the real trick, and i would think the FF team might want to look into the legal aspects of this, is, who then owns the license to the plugin? in the u.s. i would think the courts would side with the original license holder, being that the .8bf file is a 'derivative work' of the original filter. this has generally held up for other software companies. but, because of the way the eula reads, i dont know for sure.

but, i am sure i'd check this if i were FF. because i dont think it would work the way you're thinking it would. what would probably happen is that a few folks would buy FF and the majority would buy the plugins. why spend $300 for the filter maker when you can spend $50 and reap all the benefits? that certainly wouldnt be the case every time, but i can certainly see it happening. FF gets nothing and the plugin seller only has to spend $300 and makes all the revenue from the plugin sales. so, not a good deal for FF.
If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!

Craig
  Details E-Mail
CFandM
ForgeSmith

Posts: 4761
Filters: 266
Quote
StevieJ wrote:
8bf plugin package to the public


I know this part has been discussed, about creating 8bf plug-ins.
http://www.filterforge.com/forum/read...9&TID=1213
Stupid things happen to computers for stupid reasons at stupid times!
  Details E-Mail
StevieJ
Designer/Artist

Posts: 11264
Filters: 163
Hi Kraellin and CFandM smile:)

Good point if just selling packages for $50.... After reading the filter submission agreement, it seems to me that FF has iron-clad rights to all filters made here....and certainly would not have any problems in court stopping anyone from commercially selling any of them....

I was talking about an elaborate package of filters at a substantial price comparable to something like the KPT packages.....which sell for a substantial price comparable to the FF software price. There are certainly some filter makers on FF that have met and/or surpassed this benchmark in their filtermaking....the Filter Forge "Grand Masters" smile:) At that level, I think that it would work quite nicely for both FF and its aspiring filter makers....

Steve
Steve

"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :)
  Details E-Mail
StevieJ
Designer/Artist

Posts: 11264
Filters: 163
Oh, one more point..... there might be a percentage of people who just buy one of the hypothetical commercial packages of plugins and will not buy FF....but surely a majority of those who are pleased with the plugins and want more will turn to the FF software to get access to the vast library of filters that are not available in the commercial plugin packages. Most everyone is always looking for new and improved over something they already have and are pleased with.......

Steve
Steve

"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :)
  Details E-Mail
Kraellin
Kraellin

Posts: 12749
Filters: 99
dont get me wrong, steviej, i too originally thought that .8bf's would be the way to go on this. but unless FF made and controlled the sale of those, i dont think it would work well for the FF team. i think they'd lose sales.

if FF did make and control the .8bf's, that might be a different matter. you could sell packs of 10 and so on at a very low rate and make that a sort of sale's pitch to buy the full program. but it's also been demonstrated that ONE filter, all by itself, can do the work of 10 or even 20 existing filters. so, how do you sort all that out when you make the .8bf's?

you'd probably also have to hire an extra person or two to oversee all that. so, the consideration of paying for extra help also enters in here.

and just for myself, i've already got three pages of plugins installed on my graphic program. i really dont want to add 20 or 30 more plugins to this.

a 'Lite' version of the program has also been suggested by myself and others. sell just the library and the engine that drives it, but not the editor. that shld also work as a draw to buy the full program.

i'm also guessing that vladimir and the rest of the FF team have looked at and discussed most of this. i know we've discussed some of it here on the forums. and i'm also fairly sure they'd like to just get the current program wrapped up and realeased smile:)
If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!

Craig
  Details E-Mail
StevieJ
Designer/Artist

Posts: 11264
Filters: 163
I imagine that you are right. I was also thinking of it from the "growth" point of view....incentive for filter makers to pursue new and improved filters. There will come a point when filter makers will loose incentive to produce filters just to benefit FF. Sooner or later, someone will develope software that will take this idea and make it better....like being more compatable with other programs, 3D environments, plug in to CADD programs, allowing users to create 8bf plugins to use how they want, etc. Giving filter makers this kind of incentive would (1) draw and keep filter makers at FF, (2) promote the design of new filters, (3) keep filter makers submitting their very best work, and (4) keep FF out in front of the game.....much like Microsoft staying so far out in front that no one will ever touch them. The best companies draw and retain the best employees by treating them well and always keeping incentives in front of them....

Steve

Steve

"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :)
  Details E-Mail
jffe
Posts: 2869
Filters: 90
It seems like a simpler, and better, plan, is to simply wait 6-12 months, then introduce a non-editable version of FF for half price. Not everyone is going to want to make/edit filters, but everyone would have an interest in being able to use the entire up-to-date filter library.

jffe
Filter Forger
  Details E-Mail
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator
Posts: 3446
Filters: 55
Quote
StevieJ wrote:
FF has iron-clad rights to all filters made here


Steve, we don't claim ownership of the submitted filters -- they are still owned by their authors. However, the upload license requires these authors to license their creations to other Filter Forge users whenever they want to use their filter in a commercial or a non-commercial project. Technically, the author licenses the filter to us, and we sublicense it to anyone who downloads it from the Filter Library.
  Details E-Mail
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator
Posts: 3446
Filters: 55
Quote
Vladimir Golovin wrote:
wait 6-12 months, then introduce a non-editable version of FF for half price


This strategy can be viable only if we have tons of 'mainstream' filters in the library. Time will tell.
  Details E-Mail
StevieJ
Designer/Artist

Posts: 11264
Filters: 163
Ahhhh, thanx for straightening me out on that....I was under a misconception. I think the filter library is definitely getting there.... Sorry I can't be of help in the mainstream dept....I'm all the way at the other end of it smile:)

Steve
Steve

"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :)
  Details E-Mail

Join Our Community!

Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!

33,711 Registered Users
+18 new in 30 days!

153,531 Posts
+36 new in 30 days!

15,347 Topics
+72 new in year!

Create an Account

Online Users Last minute:

39 unregistered users.