Rachel Duim
 |
The main image used on the filter comments page is a "blown up" thumbnail and looks fuzzy on all comments pages. For example:
https://www.filterforge.com/forum/read...sage152534 Math meets art meets psychedelia. |
|||||
| Posted: November 10, 2019 9:45 pm | ||||||
Indigo Ray
 |
+1
I will add that this is a recent problem - last year or two I think. |
|||||
| Posted: November 12, 2019 6:12 pm | ||||||
SpaceRay
 |
I totally agree and I do not know why the used thumbnail is so low resolution and very pixelated in comparison to the perfect high quality shown on the main filter page
Why is used that bad quality on filter comments? To show clearly what it looks like here are two examples using the Sunex 2 filter by Ramlyn This is the filters comments that looks very bad 
And this the real and high quality  |
|||||
| Posted: November 16, 2019 6:59 am | ||||||
|
SpaceRay
|
I wonder why the image taken for the preview on the comments of the filter page is so badly pixelated when the original is correctly and perfect on the filters page , why is so low quality on comments filters page ?
Why is not using the same thumbnail that is used on the filter page? |
|||||
| Posted: January 20, 2020 6:15 am | ||||||
|
SpaceRay
|
I have been thinking why the thumbnail shown on the comments page of the filter is so low quality, and have thought that maybe is because probably the page is taking the icon of the preview page and enlarging it to fit in the bigger space of the comments page and so it looks very bad.
It should take really the example from the main image of the filter page that is big and has a very good quality |
|||||
| Posted: January 24, 2020 3:06 am | ||||||
|
SpaceRay
|
I wonder why there is no answer for this from GMM or Filter Forge team?
as I have put above the difference is really bad, and do not know why the filter comments have this very low quality |
|||||
| Posted: June 18, 2020 1:26 pm | ||||||
| saurabhgayali |
The image on filter download page is 512 X 512 pixels while the one in forum is 128 X 128 pixels.
I think this may be for saving space on server. But I think instead of rendering another image for forum, we can totally reuse the same image that's on the filter download page. saurabh.gayali@gmail.com |
|||||
| Posted: June 18, 2020 9:39 pm | ||||||
|
SpaceRay
|
thanks did not know the difference in resolution
If the reason is save space on server then why have TWO images instead of just only ONE and use it in both the filter page and in the comments page? |
|||||
| Posted: June 22, 2020 2:49 am | ||||||
|
Andres B
Posts: 18 |
Thumbnail in gallery submission takes forever to load up!
Andres B |
|||||
| Posted: August 8, 2020 9:19 pm | ||||||
Join Our Community!
Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!
33,711 Registered Users
+18 new in 30 days!
153,533 Posts
+38 new in 30 days!
15,348 Topics
+73 new in year!
Online Users Last minute:
24 unregistered users.
Recent Forum Posts:
- Manson Grudge Border by Jaret by Minko
3 hours ago - Kaleidoscopic Variations Vol. 2 by jhantares by jhantares
September 10, 2025 - Polygonal Images Set by Ramlyn by westdale
September 10, 2025 - FF Killing Resolution by SpaceRay
September 9, 2025 - Geometry Spinner by Rachel Duim by Rachel Duim
September 6, 2025 - Channel Glitch by Martin Naumann by SpaceRay
August 31, 2025 - Circuit Glitch by Martin Naumann by SpaceRay
August 31, 2025 - Groovy Rays by Ramlyn by Ramlyn
August 31, 2025 - Is Ultraforge dead? by dpankros
August 30, 2025 - Component Instances by AussieDecalf
August 27, 2025 - Hyperbolic Tiling Challenge by AussieDecalf
August 27, 2025 - Chaos Fields by SpaceRay
August 27, 2025
