Kraellin
![]() |
ok, what microsoft calls their 'release candidate' for windows 7 is on their website. anyone can download it and install it. it's currently free... until june, 2010. yup, free to use until then. but, you can read all the details of that here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/ev...PID=wcfeed .
what i wanted to mention was that i've seen it now and used it a tiny bit. one of the local retail computer stores had it installed on several machines in the store. this thing is pretty slick and according to the salesman i was talking to, is more stable than XP Pro. that would be nice. he demonstrated to me some of the features of the new system. the first thing i noticed and commented on was, 'this looks like mac o/s/gui.'. he agreed, but also showed me some tricks that make it even a touch better than the mac interface. it was fairly impressive. i also asked him about compatibility to existing software i own that was designed to run under XP. this is where i noticed a bit of hesitation on his part, but, there is, apparently, a 'compatability mode' you can run in to help with that. and he mentioned, right along with the compatibility issue, the driver issue of any new release. he said he had an HP printer that wouldnt run under windows 7 at first. but, he just entered administrator mode and told the printer to run anyways, and it did. now, i didnt understand exactly what he did there, but apparently microsoft has learned a couple things about compatibility issues through all the years of headaches in dealing with all this. so, as much as i wanted to not come away with liking this new windows o/s, i actually came away fairly impressed. it comes in 32 bit or 64 bit mode. the 64 bit systems can handle a lot more ram and that's what i'm currently looking at going to. my current 32 bit XP system just cant handle my large system ram needs that well. i keep getting memory crashes from working with large files and large undo's. the new o/s has a much smaller ram footprint, also. it only eats a gig of ram, roughly, where vista was eating as much as two. that shld help. it seemed very smooth, very professional and i'm seriously tempted to go out and build a new rig. i can get a nice quad core i7 with 6 megs of ram, a terrabyte drive, a gigabyte nvidia video card and 64 bit vista, for about $1500 (without monitor). on that, i could then download the release candidate and try it all out. it's really quite interesting to me my impressions of the various operating systems microsoft has come out with over the years and how those impressions panned out once i had actually tried the thing. with windows 3.1 i simply laughed the first time i tried it. 'this is a joke, right?'. with windows 95, ok, things looked a little better, but i still like my Amiga FAR better!. by the time windows98 came out, Commodore had died and i was forced into the pc market. and 98 was ok, but seemed buggy and prone to crashing quite a bit. it was better and i still have it installed on one machine, but i would never have called it 'professional'. i never had win2k or the other idiot FAT system one, so cant speak to those much. i have used win2k a bit here and there, and it seemed pretty stable, but the other one i stayed away from as it seemed to be a total joke. XP i had mixed feelings over but liked it, mostly. it was more stable than win98, by a long shot and more versatile and fixed the whole sloppy FAT 32 issue, which was eating up harddrives like crazy. so, i mostly liked XP and that's what i still use. Vista, no thanks. very sloppy, rushed out the door, a true system hog and nasty compatibility issues. so, here we are with a new release coming out and i'm already fairly well impressed and i dont even have the thing; i just tried it out in the store! so, that's my impression on the new windows. i have hope that maybe microsoft has finally put it all together in a much cleaner, much more stable o/s. i say 'hope', because, again, i dont actually have the thing yet, have only used it in the store, and only have the salesman's own impressions of it and my tiny experience with it, to go by. but, as a first impression, i actually found myself somewhat excited about this and that hasnt happened for a LONG while with windows and microsoft. let's just hope the first impression pans out ![]() If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
Posted: July 15, 2009 7:44 am | ||||
garbanzo
![]() |
ok, first let me preface this by saying that i've been using Windows 7 as my primary OS for more than 7 months now. i installed the beta on Jan 1 and have been using it ever since.
Windows 7 is, in a nutshell, fantastic. i should clear up a few things Craig said. first, as as far as RAM usage goes, 1gb is way off the mark. try 500-600mb. yes, on a fresh install, that's all Windows 7 uses. as for 32 bit or 64 bit mode, the retail release of Windows 7 is apparently going to contain both. compatibility just keeps getting better with every build. i've not had a single driver issue, and the only apps i've had problems with are those that dig deep into the system, like Sandboxie. but developers are quickly making "windows 7 compatible" apps. i'm an ex-xp-fanboy. i tried vista and despised it. but Windows 7, well, it's something different entirely. it's sexier than vista, and it's already as fast and stable as XP, and it's not even done yet. i'm even running Windows 7 at work on an old P4 with 1gb ram and 8mb integrated graphics. it runs like a dream, with full aero enabled. absolutely amazing. it's due to be finalized within a week or two, and it's going to be on shelves on October 22nd. i already pre-ordered my copy when Microsoft ran a super-low promo price of 50 GBP the other day. if you look around (hint - currys.co.uk), you (EU folk) can still find Home Premium for that promo price. try it, you'll like it ![]() oh, and the million dollar question - FF runs just fine ![]() |
|||
Posted: July 17, 2009 12:35 pm | ||||
Kraellin
![]() |
thanks, garbanzo. good to see my impressions have some substance with someone actually using it
![]() If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
Posted: July 17, 2009 7:52 pm | ||||
Redcap
![]() |
I can pre-order for $120, should I?
|
|||
Posted: July 19, 2009 9:12 am | ||||
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator |
I've been using Win7 beta and then RC, both 64-bit, as my primary OS at home. It's fantastic -- IMO, it's the best Microsoft OS to date.
|
|||
Posted: July 24, 2009 9:52 am | ||||
jffe |
Other than the Gui/Ui stuff, what is better about Windows 7 than Windows XP ? Although I only started with Windows 98, I have become the ultimate skeptic when it comes to O/S's, and going from Win98SE to WinXP, I simply can't imagine an O/S that is sooo much better than XP that I would pay money for it ha-ha.
Perhaps if it was 100% (100%) virus/malware/script proof, and I do mean 100%, and/or if (all) programs ran (considerably) faster and recalled all (all) previous settings whether or not the program was coded to do so, in addition to it being again 100% as stable (100% as stable) and good as XP, then maybe I might (might) someday pay for the upgrade. Short of that, all the programs I use and want updates for would have to require (require) a new O/S before I would even begin to think about upgrading. ![]() jffe Filter Forger |
|||
Posted: July 24, 2009 10:31 am | ||||
Kraellin
![]() |
vlad, i'm glad to hear you say that. again, it confirms what i saw and what the store guy was telling me. good to know.
jffe, stability is better than xp. it's almost as big a jump as going from win98 to winxp in stability. plus, it operates in 64 bit much better than any other 64 bit o/s from microsoft, and that means the 3 gig limit on system ram is now opened up. i've seen rigs selling now with 8 gigs of ram, and that's in the store. online, you could probably order 16 gigs. if you could get one, imagine that with a flash harddrive as your c: drive, imagine turning on the computer and you're instantly in win7, no bootup time to speak of. you have 8 gigs of ram and a two-terrabyte raid mirror system for backup. your dual quadcore screams with the help of your 2 gig nvidea vid card. rendering large files in FF or photoshop just got sped up by about 10x ![]() from what i've seen and heard, jffe, this is going to be a no-brainer. the only issue i've got any concern on at this point, is running all my old software. that remains to be seen yet and i guess the only way i'm going to find out is, go out and try it. after all, it's free for now. you dont have to pay till june of 2010. so, might as well test it out, ay? If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
Posted: July 24, 2009 1:01 pm | ||||
jffe |
Will it offer those speed improvements just by (the user) adding more DDR2 ram, or will we need a new mobo and DDR3 ram to really take advantage of the 64 bit O/S capabilities ?
And as far as stability, I have almost no problems with WinXP as far as that is concerned, so that doesn't really mean anything to me personally. I crash or lock up maybe once every 3 months, if that. jffe Filter Forger |
|||
Posted: July 24, 2009 1:55 pm | ||||
Kraellin
![]() |
jffe,
well, you can get it in 32 bit or 64 bit. the speed advantages would be there any time you can increase the effective amount of system ram available, so, that pretty much means 64 bit. the o/s footprint in ram is smaller than vista, too. i think vista took almost 2 gigs where win7 takes about 6 or 700 megs, according to the store guy. and yes, i'm pretty sure you need a 64 bit mobo to run 64 bit software. ddr3 would help, of course, but you dont have to have it. the mimimum specs listed on microsoft.com seem, to me, pretty reasonable. look, i dont know everything about win7 by a long shot. i dont have it yet and have only seen it being run in the store and talked to a few people about it, but everyone i've talked to that's used it, loves it! but, i shld mention that that store is quickly converting most of their computers on display to win7. oh, and there is also an xp compatibility mode in case you have trouble running old software in the new system. what i figure i'll be doing is building a new rig. i looked at the upgrade version of win7 and you can upgrade from xp to it, but it looked a bit odd in what you had to do to do that. they wanted a clean install, and i think they meant of xp and were recommending you back up all your files first, do the clean install and then upgrade and put all your stuff back. hmmm, you read it and see what you think it says: http://store.microsoft.com/microsoft/...ng_product . look down on the bottom, right of that page where it says 'running earlier versions?'. so, i figure i'll avoid all that and just get the full version on a clean, new machine. If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
Posted: July 25, 2009 7:34 am | ||||
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator |
In this department, I like Win7 a lot more than XP, because Win7 makes it easy to set up and work under a non-admin user account. I've implemented this setup at home with two accounts: 1. Admin account (full privileges) to configure the OS, install updates and software for all users etc -- used very rarely. 2. Work account (restricted privileges) for my everyday (or rather everyevening, everynight and everyholiday) work, play and web surfing. Both account have the UAC set to 3, its default level. 99% of the time, I sit under the non-admin account, Work. Since it's non-admin, it makes malware infiltration a lot less likely. Additionally, the Win7 RC runs the UAC settings dialog as a high-integrity process, which means that malware won't be able to gain admin privileges by manipulating the UAC via its user interface. Here's more on the UAC security in Win7: http://blogs.msdn.com/e7/archive/2009...ow-up.aspx |
|||
Posted: July 26, 2009 5:45 am | ||||
Kraellin
![]() |
thanks, vlad. the more i hear, the more i'm liking this new o/s.
uac = user account control, btw. If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
Posted: July 26, 2009 8:51 am | ||||
Kraellin
![]() |
well, i went out and bought a new rig today, ordered it, anyways. it will be in friday. it's an i7 quad core, 2.66 ghz, MSI 64 bit mobo, 6 gigs of DDR3 system ram, with 64 bit windows 7 ultimate installed. it comes with an 876 meg vid card and an 800 watt power supply. the case is the green nvidea, 5 slot, side harddrive insert (for easy maintenance and has dual terrabyte harddrives set up in raid mirroring. oh, and a 22 inch Acer lcd monitor.
full price, built, o/s installed, raid set up and everything working = $1901.40 u.s. i could have probably gotten it cheaper online or if i'd built my own, which i usually do, but they had a pretty sweet deal going on the base package and i talked the guy into not putting vista on it and putting win7 on it instead. this is the sweetest, higher end rig i've ever gotten. i normally dont splurge this much any more for a computer, but i'm just sick of xp crshing or crashing other apps and never having enough memory. this rig comes with 6 gigs but will take up to 12 gigs of ddr3, which i may max out later on ![]() If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
Posted: July 26, 2009 2:36 pm | ||||
Carl
![]() |
wow sounds very nice and your prices [ US ] are so much cheaper than we get things
![]() It's funny talking about XP crashing off and on, Vista [ I know you have to spit when you say the word ![]() ![]() |
|||
Posted: July 27, 2009 2:33 am | ||||
Kraellin
![]() |
hi carl,
well, i dont quite spit when mentioning vista *fart*, but i have stayed away from it as best i could. it's most likely not nearly as bad as i'd heard, and i really only ever heard. it's not like i ran the thing myself. so take my jokes with a grain of salt. and i did see recently where service pack 2 is out for it now, and i'm sure that helps. i also found out another thing today. windows 7 rc (release candidate) is not going to be allowed for anyone to keep. it expires in june 2010, which i already knew, but, when the official release comes out in october, sometime after than, and before june, you have to overwrite rc with a legal, retail copy. some are saying not only that, but that you have to do a reinstall with the official release. so, it's not going to be a thing where you can simply get a new product code by paying for the official release; you're going to have to buy the official release and remove rc and install the official release, or so it seems so far from what i've both heard from one person and seen on microsoft.com. that comes as a bit of surprise. so, buying my new rig with the rc installed means i'm going to have to lose it again in a couple months. doh! so, i guess i really am going to just test it out on the new rig. if i end up not liking it, then i'll put xp or vista on it and go from there. the store where i get this stuff will install any of those you want. i'm still guessing i'll just wipe rc and put win7 on, but it does throw a small wrench in my plans. ah well, leave it to microsoft ![]() If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
Posted: July 27, 2009 1:13 pm | ||||
Carl
![]() |
Then you'd be better off getting Vista or Xp so you only pay for an upgrade when you go to 7
![]() |
|||
Posted: July 28, 2009 6:53 am | ||||
Kraellin
![]() |
yeah, but then i have to buy two o/s's to get one and that just seems wrong. it's only for a couple months. i can treat it as a test computer till then and then put the full, official release on. i wish microsoft wouldnt do it like this, but, oh well
![]() If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
Posted: July 28, 2009 7:04 am | ||||
garbanzo
![]() |
you bought a rig with RC1 on it? that's very suspicious. i hope you didn't get charged for it since it's free for anyone to download!
![]() FWIF, Windows 7 is final, and it's in the wild. theoretically you can install it today. you'll have to rearm the activation every 30 days - something that can be done 3x for a max trial period of 120 days which will easily bring you to the October 22 release date, at which point you will get your official key and you can just punch it in. that's what i've done anyway. i pre-ordered Home Premium for GBP50 when Microsoft had a very generous pre-sale a few weeks ago. on October 22 i'll get my key in an email, and i'm good to go ![]() |
|||
Posted: August 3, 2009 7:05 am | ||||
Kraellin
![]() |
garbanzo,
i would have thought that also, but according to the microsoft site and to a salesman where i bought the computer, RC does expire, but you cannot just get a new product key. you have to do a clean install of the official release. this is from the microsoft site:
and that was found on this page: http://search.microsoft.com/results.a...ndows+7+RC but, microsoft is offering that anyone buying vista now can get win7 for free when it's released. that's according to the store guys where i'm getting my new rig. so, they're putting vista on and i'll get win7 when it becomes official. here's a page that talks about this from the microsoft.com site: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/buy/...grade.aspx If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
Posted: August 3, 2009 7:45 am | ||||
Kraellin
![]() |
well, i just got my new beast home! this thing is heavy! did i mention it has a 750 watt power supply? lol. i've never had one over 400 watts before
![]() ![]() ![]() If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
Posted: August 5, 2009 1:25 pm | ||||
Kraellin
![]() |
ok, i've got the bare minimum set up that i needed to turn the rig on. it works
![]() i havent loaded any apps yet nor really tested much. it looks nice, but i didnt buy it for its looks. what i'll probably do is put the filter forge demo on there along with photoshop and move some filters over from the other machine to put things under stress and see how the two rigs compare in render times. shld be interesting. If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
Posted: August 5, 2009 3:54 pm | ||||
jffe |
I'm still totally not sold on Windows 7, even as a 1/3-1/2 way "power user" of my pc, between audio/graphics/video editing. But, I am trying to keep an open mind, and will wait for real world reports on how much faster things can be done, since well, since Pentium 3's, what else is there but speed and a few more frames per second when yer playing Halo XVII
![]() jffe Filter Forger |
|||
Posted: August 5, 2009 5:55 pm | ||||
Kraellin
![]() |
it's ok, jffe, i dont make a commission even if you do go for it
![]() If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
Posted: August 5, 2009 9:06 pm | ||||
Beliria
![]() |
Think I'll wait till W7 is out next October and has been in use for a little while.
Nothing wrong with a little insanity ;)
|
|||
Posted: August 8, 2009 12:46 pm | ||||
Kraellin
![]() |
yeah, i'm sort of wishing the same, bel. i just found out yesterday that they installed the 32 bit version of vista on this machine. man, i may have to find a new store. i called them and they said, 'oh, well, we're getting in some 64 o/s's soon. we're out of them right now, but we'll call you when they come in and we'll re-install.'. *sigh* so, in the meantime, it's somewhat pointless to do installs on my new rig. i'm just playing windows games and this $2000.00 rig. lol. this store has pissed me off before and they're doing it again. i may have to go back to building my own again.
also, they installed Norton anti-virus on the machine. i didnt want norton, so i uninstalled it in order to put avg on. when i rebooted to set the registry straight, windows wouldnt come up. uninstalling norton wiped out the master boot record! i hate norton! thankfully, i had managed to get a restore disk with the new rig and it was a fairly simple repair, but still, uninstalling ANY software that isnt the o/s shld NOT destroy the o/s! this is why i stay away from norton as much as possible. bah! If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
Posted: August 8, 2009 4:41 pm | ||||
Beliria
![]() |
ouch! Craig that sucks big time! Not used Norton for years, tried one of the avg virus/firewall system what's it ones recently but was bugging me to bits so went back to Kaspersky.
Mind I do want a new pc kinda feeling restricted at the moment with lack of ram etc when running multiple software, so much for multitasking ![]() Nothing wrong with a little insanity ;)
|
|||
Posted: August 8, 2009 6:41 pm | ||||
Kraellin
![]() |
i bought a laptop for work. i wont buy another. way too weak, slow, and bogs down quite a bit. mind, i didnt buy a very high end one, but still, i expected a bit better. i suppose if you're on the road a lot it makes sense, but if not, i wouldnt get one again.
If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
Posted: August 8, 2009 9:59 pm | ||||
Kraellin
![]() |
well, after three separate installs of the operating system, i've finally got vista home premium 64 bit on the new rig. in fact, i'm on it right now. they first installed the o/s without putting on the RAID. so, they wiped that one and tried again. when i got it home, now with RAID, i uninstalled norton antivirus and it broke the master boot record, whereupon i fixed the o/s with the repair function of the install disk. that's when i found out they had put the 32 bit vista home premium on my machine. so, i took it back. they had to order the 64 bit o/s and then took about four days to install it. and, when win7 comes out, yes, i shld get it for free, but it's going to be yet another install. i'm thinking i shld have just waited for win7 to come out before buying this thing and i'm definitely thinking of changing stores. sheesh!
anyways, i've got the basics on here now, zone alarm, avg anti-virus and win patrol. i've also downloaded FF but havent installed it yet. maybe tomorrow. it's late ![]() the rig looks nice. the main box is quite quiet. fan technology has gotten a lot better in recent years... low noise now. i've got just a 22 inch monitor. i almost went for the 30 inch, but it was about twice as much, so, maybe later. vista is a hog, but with 6 actual functioning gigs of system ram and almost 1 gig of vid memory, i dont notice it too much... so far. we'll see when i put 50 gigs of pictures on here and 3 gigs of FF filters ![]() so, for the moment, all is well with the world ![]() If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
Posted: August 18, 2009 11:54 pm | ||||
Carl
![]() |
just got today vista service pack 2 [ installing as we speak ] ........... wait on it's telling me I have to close all open progams ........... your new pc sound very nice
![]() ![]() |
|||
Posted: August 19, 2009 2:43 am | ||||
Carl
![]() |
all done ........... of course I can't tell any difference LOL
![]() |
|||
Posted: August 19, 2009 3:14 am | ||||
Kraellin
![]() |
oh that's right, service pack 2 is out for vista. bleh, i wanna play with my new computer, not load a ton of junk into it!
![]() If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
Posted: August 19, 2009 9:19 am | ||||
Kraellin
![]() |
ok, i've installed the trial version of FF on the new rig and downloaded a couple filters i knew to be somewhat slow on my old rig. comparing the two rig render times is quite simply, amazing! the new rig is almost 10 TIMES FASTER! for the evergreen filter, my old rig renders the default at about 72 seconds. the new rig cranks it out at under 8 seconds! three dee's 'tree, summer' on the old renders in 3 minutes, 39 seconds. on the new rig it's 27.88 seconds! hehe, i've got a big old smile on my face this morning
![]() If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
Posted: August 19, 2009 10:57 am | ||||
jffe | ||||
Posted: September 2, 2009 5:32 pm | ||||
Kraellin
![]() |
well, i'm not throwing away my xp machine, jffe, but i am getting win7 for free now when it comes out
![]() If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
Posted: September 3, 2009 7:35 am | ||||
sammypetter
Posts: 3 |
Windows 7 is best.Because it has better features then the other.And Windows 7 is a vast improvement from Vista as it takes up much less ram and has other optimizations such as fast booting times. I recommend Windows 7, and if you really don't want vista and don't want to wait for the final version of Windows 7, you can download a copy of the Release Candidate from the Microsoft website for free and use it up till June of 2010. I am working with the Release Candidate right now and so far I have absolutely no complaints, considering Im a heavy computer use with advanced software.
|
|||
Posted: January 9, 2010 12:31 am | ||||
Beliria
![]() |
lol link has expired for some reason.. got win 7 with my new machine still getting used to some of the functions. Nothing wrong with a little insanity ;)
|
|||
Posted: January 16, 2010 8:02 am |
Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!
33,711 Registered Users
+18 new in 30 days!
153,531 Posts
+36 new in 30 days!
15,347 Topics
+72 new in year!
37 unregistered users.