garbanzo
![]() |
this is kind of aimed at voldemort since he's been throwing out some good info in redcap's new computer thread, but anyone else caring to contribute is welcome:
what's a good way to ease into linux? i'm getting fed up with having to reformat my xp machine every few months, then spending days tweaking it all to my liking so it actually runs at a decent speed. then once it's tweaked, still having to run registry cleaners all the time, defragmenting after every uninstall or major file structure change... it's all just too much for me. plus i like to try new things, and lots of the best software i've found recently has been open source.. anyway i've got some programs that only work in a windows environment which has been keeping me from making the change, but i suppose dual-boot is an option? anyway most of those programs were specialty things i needed for my PhD research but now that's done so i can set them aside. and i've started using gimp and openoffice in anticipation of a transition soon. i'd appreciate your 10 cents on the matter! i know there are forums and beginner guides for this, but we're all friendly here, right? thanks! |
|||||
Posted: March 5, 2008 12:38 am | ||||||
garbanzo
![]() |
ok so work is boring today so i've looked into this myself, which i should have done to begin with. decided to go with SLAX on an old 1 gig thumb drive i have gathering dust. seems to be quite customizable. i'll try wine for some of the programs i really want to keep (like MediaMan which i just discovered - what a nice program!) and see how that goes.
this way i can boot into linux most of the time when i'm just writing emails or watching a movie, but use XP if i need to do some other tasks. seems pretty ideal! still, if anyone has suggestions, i'd be grateful ![]() |
|||||
Posted: March 5, 2008 4:06 am | ||||||
Kraellin
![]() |
ubuntu is the way i'd recommend someone go who's never installed linux before. it runs from a cd and ram. you dont even need to partition a drive for a linux drive. after that, i'm a bit out of the scene, but i still hear 'redhat' thrown around a lot.
If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||||
Posted: March 5, 2008 7:07 am | ||||||
garbanzo
![]() |
thanks kraellin for the advice. i looked at a few live-cds with ubuntu, but SLAX seems better for my needs because it's customizable - with a live-cd, you're stuck with whatever the author put on it, but with SLAX, the program installations are modular so i can load a bootable thumb drive with all the programs i need, from skype to openoffice, and they're booted right along with linux. seems ideal. plus no partitioning or anything like that.
i already set up my thumb drive but i have to wait until i get home from work to try it out. actually no i have to install carpet in the living room first so i have to wait till later - but anyway i'm looking forward to it! does FF work with Wine?? |
|||||
Posted: March 5, 2008 7:41 am | ||||||
Kraellin
![]() |
interesting. hadnt heard of slax before. looks new. the web pages arent even done yet
![]() so, how do you get around not having a partition on slax? slax is a live type, also? so, you boot it up from cd/dvd and then insert your thumb (or already have the thumb inserted) and it sees that and loads all the stuff there or it just makes all that available? sounds pretty slick, almost like vmware. If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||||
Posted: March 5, 2008 8:22 am | ||||||
garbanzo
![]() |
yeah it's live, but it actually boots from the thumb drive. no CD at all. the OS and software modules are all crammed in there. the original package is about 200 megs, and i have the whole install at around 300 now with some additional software modules thrown in. you just dump a .tar of the distro onto your thumb drive, run a .bat file that writes a boot menu to the master boot sector, and you're ready to go. software modules go into a folder. easy as pie.
you can make a CD too, there's a tool to customize the .iso of the live-cd with additional modules and such, but i like the idea of a thumb drive install much better. easier to carry around. slick indeed! now let's see if i can figure out how to play a DVD or connect to the internet... total linux noob here ![]() |
|||||
Posted: March 5, 2008 8:29 am | ||||||
Kraellin
![]() |
hehe, aint lernin fun
![]() ![]() If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||||
Posted: March 5, 2008 9:11 am | ||||||
StevieJ
![]() |
Interesting.....I would like to learn more about it too.....
![]() Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||||
Posted: March 5, 2008 10:54 am | ||||||
garbanzo
![]() |
darnit i can't get my wireless card to work. lots to learn! everything else is good though. gotta find a better picture viewer, and find a module of gimpshop someplace...
this is cool! the carpet delivery guy is 40 minutes late. why am i not surprised?? |
|||||
Posted: March 5, 2008 11:41 am | ||||||
Kraellin
![]() |
this may be something i try also. i've got a 2 gig thumbdrive around here somewhere. might be fun
![]() if you cant find gimpshop, i know of two other versions, gimp and gimp-...something. i'll have to look it up again. the wireless card may take some extra configuration and driver loading. linux has always been like that ![]() If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||||
Posted: March 5, 2008 3:16 pm | ||||||
garbanzo
![]() |
yeah i know about having to set up hardware, i'll have to look into it a little deeper. didn't get much time to play around yesterday, but hopefully this weekend i can look at it more. i'm pretty impressed with Wine, i got some basic windows software to run just like i was in windows. cool! i suppose the only way i'll really make it is to learn the command line stuff. i'll have to go find a 'linux for dummies' ebook today... |
|||||
Posted: March 6, 2008 12:10 am | ||||||
Kraellin
![]() |
yup, good old command line. i've still got a couple books on it from when i used to run a linux partition. been years, though.
If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||||
Posted: March 6, 2008 12:27 pm | ||||||
voldemort |
Just to let you know --Linux is Linux About the only real difference with distros is what packages are included in the base
--all of them can install the same packages 2nd difference package managment deb rpm tar source deb and rpm being the easiest any additional config tools the distro provider might produce theese really arnt that many but can make life much easier the quality of packages made for your distro not all packages are packaged equally that said source is the most reliable but a pain in the rear beyond that for newbies I recomend stable builds of the good old tried and true distos like redhat and suse debian(not ubuntu) but for ease of use and installation mandrake and ubuntu suse and fedora (public version of redhat) as far as thumbdrive goes --all of them have this capacity --it might not be as straight forward with some for instance there is no click here to make a thumb drive version of ubuntu but there are a ton of articles telling you how and distro derivatives of ubuntu that are thumb drive ready you want to know the truth untill your feet are wet install a minimal install and if you have 2 cores on your box download vmware player (free version of vmware) and a precompiled image of linux --quick and painless way to get your feet wet and safer ---this way if it crashes you just copy the image file back and your up and running in seconds --this is why so many companies are going virtual at the enterprise level I use a wide variety of linux distos --to keep familliar with the various distro quirks but for beginners that want a full install I generally give them ubuntu with the kde desktop (kubuntu) though I found installing ubuntu and then adding kde to it tends to be more stable for thumbdrive users I tend to install mandrake linux one last thing to consider is andlinux it is a derivative of colinux that insalls linux on a loopback file system and runs it as a NT process --this way you can explore linux with out any drastic action and since it runs as a NT process it hardly uses any resources good luck and have fun any questions PM me lets all whine for a wine port |
|||||
Posted: March 7, 2008 9:48 pm | ||||||
CFandM
![]() |
Nope FF will not run in wine...The installer itself runs with only the beta of FF but not newer versions...But thats the only thing that did for me..Just the installer not FF itself....You would have to install FF manually but that is a HUGE chore to do..Not to mention that there is to many things that can be missed while installing...
The other thing you can do is download the Free version of VirtualPC and test your Linux skills with this... http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/de...laylang=en Stupid things happen to computers for stupid reasons at stupid times! |
|||||
Posted: March 8, 2008 6:13 am | ||||||
voldemort |
actually with the latest svn build I get it to run except for 3 components in the editor when ever I try to drag them I can expect it to crash --and hard
yeah virt pc is free vm ware player is free virtual box is also free the reason I steared him towards vmware free player you can download premade images of linux wich the others dont have if you really want to squeeze the most performance out of your box inotek virtual box --every system Ive tested it on repeatedly beats all the competition including commercial (non free) ones warning though with player --not all the hardware specs cant be changed from the qui --conf files yes and from a command line but not with the gui --the free version is limited If I ever get it working properly (that is everything) Ill precompile a deb and rpm of my wine install and upload it to the ff team i expect a wine version very soon now that google is bankrolling code weavers wine development has really taken off lets all whine for a wine port |
|||||
Posted: March 8, 2008 7:04 am | ||||||
Kraellin
![]() |
CF, one note to folks here, virtualpc will not run on windows xp home version. at least it's not supported by M$:
If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||||
Posted: March 8, 2008 9:28 am | ||||||
garbanzo
![]() |
well i spent some time playing with the slackware distro i downloaded. i don't know, i think i'm just not enough of a power user to make the switch. i'm pretty proficient with windows, and though it has its bumps, it doesn't let me down that often.
so thanks for the input, but i have found what i was looking for by just modding windows. i think i'll go with this instead: http://emergedesktop.org/ it's a lovely shell replacement for explorer. i've had it installed for a few days and have it configured pretty nicely. along with this program launcher: http://www.launchy.net/index.html it is pretty pleasing, and runs much better than explorer ever did on my old laptop. quicker and easier to get what i need out of my machine. plus, both resources are open source which i like! below is a snapshot of my current desktop configuration - right clicking on the desktop gives you a start menu. the desktop stays exposed at the bottom so it's always accessible. the thing in the middle is Launchy - a hotkey brings it up, then just start typing the program/folder/file you want and it comes up with a list of possibilities. very customizable, and much faster than the start menu. bottom right is the system tray, set to 20% transparency but changes to 100% on mouseover. clicking on the clock turns it into a text box that works like the windows 'run' command. bottom left is the taskbar. also running a graphical alt-tab replacement called TopDesk. the calendar top-right is a program called Rainlender, and the weather gadget is powered by DesktopX. a patched uxtheme.dll lets me run unofficial windows themes, that's how i got the look. custom icon set too. oh and also running as part of the shell replacement is an amazing hotkey program that really makes things move quickly by reducing mouse usage even more ![]() all that, and it's still quicker than the original explorer shell! so yes i'm sure linux can do all this and more, but i threw this together in a couple of evenings, and i'm happy with it. linux would take me weeks to figure out. and this way, i have no software issues... ![]() |
|||||
Posted: March 9, 2008 12:19 am | ||||||
Kraellin
![]() |
hehe, you forget, you're running M$ windows ![]() ![]() If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||||
Posted: March 9, 2008 12:33 am | ||||||
CFandM
![]() |
Hey wheres the free OSX version... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Stupid things happen to computers for stupid reasons at stupid times! |
|||||
Posted: March 15, 2008 1:09 pm |
Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!
33,711 Registered Users
+18 new in 30 days!
153,531 Posts
+36 new in 30 days!
15,347 Topics
+72 new in year!
19 unregistered users.