SpaceRay
![]() |
It seems that Google and Intel have been investigating about Quantum computer chips to make even faster computers to be able to go over the limitaion of actual chips technology and they are now showing it for real, Intel showed already their prototype chip, and here is a news fr om Google that shows their new quantum chip that has 72 Qubits!!
Google Quantum processor See here explained what is the difference of a quantum processor
If I understand correctly it is supposed that this quantum computers are going to replace the actual supercomputers, that are really very expensive, so maybe and probably the price will be very high, at least at the beginning, and maybe it will not be affordable for domestic computer, only for very big and rich companies, although I do not have yet enough information to know about this Here is a news from five days ago in march 2018 Cnet article about Google quantum computers Intel showed recently their quantum chips shown here news about Intel quantum chips |
|||||
Posted: March 11, 2018 3:11 am | ||||||
chrisd
Posts: 51 |
The cooling requirement is a barrier in making these affordable and fit in a small package. Unless the quantum state can be maintained at a much higher temperature, its unlikely that a quantum computer as we know it now will be a consumer device.
Scientists were successful in creating organic lasers based on jellyfish proteins so its not a huge stretch to think that there could be a biochemical solution in this case as well. As long as it doesn't smell like low tide ... |
|||||
Posted: March 11, 2018 11:30 am | ||||||
emme |
It's good to keep in mind that quantum computing is quite different from classical computing. It's potentially good for solving specific problems, but can't be used for general computing at the moment - and most likely won't replace current (super)computers any time soon.
As far as I understand, a 72 qubit computer can only output 72 bits of information. For comparison, a 600x600 image is 2,880,000 bits of information. The output of a quantum computer is also probabilistic, so it has to be run multiple times for error correction. Lots of unknowns and engineering problems still to solve. Anyway, very interesting technology. Let's hope we can make it useful. |
|||||
Posted: March 11, 2018 11:58 am | ||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
As far as I understand it according to the text, the output is not 72 bit, what is told is that classic computer can only process 1 bit at once (or 2 bits if you use hyperthread) and a quantum computer can process in this case 72 qubits at once, so in therory I think it should be 72 times faster than a single core chip classic computer, as it seems that 1 qubit is equivalent to 1 bit (maybe this is wrong) So a quantum computer can process 72 qubits at once, and a classic computer 1 or 2 bits, although now there is the multicores chips, so each core can process 1 or 2 bits at once, and if you have for example 64 cores then you would be able to process 64 or 128 bits at once. Maybe I am confusing things and is not this way, and really you can not probably compares qbits to bits so easily, sorry that know very little about quantum computing |
|||||
Posted: March 11, 2018 3:04 pm | ||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
just found this but have no time to read it yet, it looks useful and interesting to explain how quantum computing works
How quantum computing works |
|||||
Posted: March 11, 2018 3:39 pm | ||||||
emme |
Modern processors have billions of transistors, running at billions of times per second (that's a lot of bits). A quantum computer basically runs only once, but can potentially have a huge number of states simultaneously (qubits in superpositon).
A 72 qubit computer can have 2^72 states, but this state cannot be read directly - the superposition has to collapse into a 72 bit output. So you can basically only ask one question and the answer has to fit into 72 bits. This can still be useful, if the question is really hard for classical computers ![]() |
|||||
Posted: March 11, 2018 5:33 pm | ||||||
Rachel Duim
![]() |
Here is a quote from extremetech.com:
"Decoherence" is the main problem with quantum computing:
So getting rates over 50 qubits seems to be the threshold Google and others are shooting for to beat the best supercomputers. Probably in the next decade we will see these chips, probably extraordinarily expensive at first (and perhaps requiring a refrigerator to cool them), but given time... Math meets art meets psychedelia. |
|||||
Posted: March 11, 2018 7:45 pm | ||||||
The_Funktasm
![]() |
What is really interesting to think of is that in the past, what has been called a supercomputer has become more or less useless and highly outdated nowadays. That will only continue as it has, so at some point we can look at this news and laugh because we remember this being a big deal once, and low end computers will resemble an upgrade to the current cutting edge.
|
|||||
Posted: March 11, 2018 9:45 pm | ||||||
Skybase
![]() |
So is the render done or not done until I observe it? lol
|
|||||
Posted: March 12, 2018 3:34 am | ||||||
CFandM
![]() |
Yes ![]() Stupid things happen to computers for stupid reasons at stupid times! |
|||||
Posted: March 12, 2018 6:47 am | ||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
Very good ![]() This remember me that then quantum computer is like the Schrodinger's cat, it can be both alive or death, until you open the box and observe it, and in this case until until you observe the result of the computer ![]() |
|||||
Posted: March 12, 2018 11:10 am | ||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
To explain the similarity from the quantum and the cat is explained here from university of Yale
In quantum computing, doubling down on Schrödinger’s cat And searching for more related things I have found 52 pages Slideshare presentation has many possible interesting questions and answers about this topic and seems to explain more about this to understand it better in some way Down the Quantum Rabbit hole For the Schrodinger's cat, there is an alternative way to see if the cat is alive or not without opening the box, as shown below, but of course this system is not good and can not be done with the computer or with the data ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Posted: March 12, 2018 11:16 am | ||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
As I supossed right now is available BUT at an incredibly high price and is also a huge computer taking much space.
Do you have 15 MILLION $ to buy one? ![]() ![]() but the money to buy is NOT the main problem, because the problem of course is that NONE of the available OS is compatible with quantum way of doing things, and so none of the compatible software will work in any quantum computer, so really it would be useless to buy a quantum computer for personal use, as there is NO software available for it, there is only custom scientific and specific software for custom tasks. You can not install Windows or MacOS and use FF ![]() ![]() D-Wave is now shipping its new $15 million, 10-foot tall quantum computerp Here is what this D-Wave quantum computer works now with its own OS Is it possible to run Linux on a quantum computer in the future? so the question really is When Will Quantum Computers Be Consumer Products?
|
|||||
Posted: March 20, 2018 6:19 am |
Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!
33,711 Registered Users
+18 new in 30 days!
153,533 Posts
+38 new in 30 days!
15,348 Topics
+73 new in year!
17 unregistered users.