Sjeiti
 |
||
| Posted: March 9, 2009 5:04 am | ||
|
Sjeiti
|
Nice the insides
I was almost going to congratulate you on finding a very cool solution to the problem. Only the spacing isn't quite right (see attached image). With five steps you'd expect 20 percent steps. I attached a threshold to check this and the first threshold step occurs around 17. In the attached image (the threshold with the attached profile) you will want the steps to be evenly spaced in the vertical direction as well. You're almost there though...  |
|
| Posted: March 9, 2009 5:17 am | ||
|
Sjeiti
|
I'm not sure if this solution is exactly correct but it looks like it. I found by manually adjusting a frequency component that (when frequency is set from 1-2) the frequency itself would amount to .5*(1/steps). Now I don't know how to get 1/steps but with a little trial and error it seems a bias set to 98 does the trick.
Then again... no this one doesn't fit either... set steps to 100 and you'll see why. I'll just post it anyway to give you another approach. correct step gradient snippet.ffxml |
|
| Posted: March 9, 2009 5:55 am | ||
| voldemort |
Thank you for the reply to be candid I would have never noticed that
your absolutly correct to the naked eye it looked dead on but when I measured it on screen (the default preset of 5 steps) the two end steps on the right where thicker Ill look in to correcting this when I get a chance may be a bit since My workload in recent months has been huge Gotta love the econemy theese days --allways more work for less money lets all whine for a wine port |
|
| Posted: March 9, 2009 9:44 am | ||
|
Sjeiti
|
Oh wait... I got it (when I was at the toilet
 ). Since the maximum amount of steps is one hundred the minimum value of the bias should be one (one hundredst). Just checked it with a 20000x20000 image.
(yeah I'm very busy with my work to,... but I just can't get problems like this out of my head )correct step gradient snippet.ffxml |
|
| Posted: March 9, 2009 10:05 am | ||
| voldemort |
Way to go --your fix your credit time for you to submit it --great work and brilliant stroke figureing it out
lets all whine for a wine port |
|
| Posted: March 9, 2009 10:22 am | ||
|
Sjeiti
|
Hey you started it... just update it.
|
|
| Posted: March 9, 2009 10:47 am | ||
Join Our Community!
Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!
33,711 Registered Users
+18 new in 30 days!
153,531 Posts
+36 new in 30 days!
15,347 Topics
+72 new in year!
Online Users Last minute:
9 unregistered users.
Recent Forum Posts:
- Kaleidoscopic Variations Vol. 2 by jhantares by jhantares
September 10, 2025 - Polygonal Images Set by Ramlyn by westdale
September 10, 2025 - FF Killing Resolution by SpaceRay
September 9, 2025 - Geometry Spinner by Rachel Duim by Rachel Duim
September 6, 2025 - Channel Glitch by Martin Naumann by SpaceRay
August 31, 2025 - Circuit Glitch by Martin Naumann by SpaceRay
August 31, 2025 - Groovy Rays by Ramlyn by Ramlyn
August 31, 2025 - Is Ultraforge dead? by dpankros
August 30, 2025 - Component Instances by AussieDecalf
August 27, 2025 - Hyperbolic Tiling Challenge by AussieDecalf
August 27, 2025 - Chaos Fields by SpaceRay
August 27, 2025 - New awesome TEXT component FF 14 - How to get the most of it? by SpaceRay
August 20, 2025
