Messages 1 - 45 of 61
First | Prev. | 1 2 | Next | Last |
StevieJ
![]() |
Shark Tank! by Crapadilla
http://www.filterforge.com/filters/2853.html ![]() Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||||
Posted: May 23, 2007 10:26 am | ||||||
StevieJ
![]() |
The depth submerged in water is perfect!!! Excellent work!!!
I can't wait for the day that I'm able to create anything I can envision like you.... You definitely have achieved world.....errr.....filter library domination ![]() "It's good to be the king" eh??? ![]() ![]() ![]() Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||||
Posted: May 23, 2007 10:32 am | ||||||
Rawn (RawArt)
![]() |
||||||
Posted: May 23, 2007 10:47 am | ||||||
voldemort |
Sweet its finally here
![]() lets all whine for a wine port |
|||||
Posted: May 23, 2007 10:52 am | ||||||
StevieJ
![]() |
Rawn, cool pic!!!
![]() Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||||
Posted: May 23, 2007 12:02 pm | ||||||
Presidio
![]() |
Love the fitler----> Grapping a copy now~
![]() ![]() ![]() Beautiful work Crapadilla!!~ |
|||||
Posted: May 23, 2007 12:29 pm | ||||||
Kraellin
![]() |
hehe, nice one, rawn
![]() If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||||
Posted: May 23, 2007 1:10 pm | ||||||
Torley
![]()
Posts: 303 |
Liquidy! OMG, another smash hit from the most antithetical name ever, "Crapadilla". I've gotta apply this to some Second Life pictures and see what transpires.
Rawn, that looks so freaky, like outta some kinda horror freakshow! I'm enjoying using Filter Forge to create http://torley.com/textures |
|||||
Posted: May 23, 2007 5:42 pm | ||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
Thanks all!
Let me know if you got any ideas to make it even better! ![]() --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||
Posted: May 23, 2007 6:11 pm | ||||||
Zephos
![]() |
It's out! It's out! Happy, happy! *Downloads!* ^_^ Glad to see Shark Tank finally released in it's gone gold glory and it looks absolutely breath taking -- more less literally, ahahaha ^_~! You've outdone yourself on this filter along with Cartography Crapadilla! Outstanding work!
The only thing I could think of adding would be in tank air bubbles (You know, like from stuff drowning) -- well, that or actual sharks, ahahah, although definitely not necessary as doing something like that would be enough to cover it's own filter ^_- -Zephos |
|||||
Posted: May 23, 2007 8:07 pm | ||||||
StevieJ
![]() |
Yeah, I'd like to see that too ![]() I'm trying to do something similar.....embed the random-shaped and elongated bubbles of my "WetGlassExtreme" to look like they have more depth inside the glass.... Did you get my email??? ![]() Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||||
Posted: May 23, 2007 8:38 pm | ||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
Yup, thought about that, but to this end my experiments with the refraction component have been unsatisfactory so far. To faithfully reproduce air bubbles underwater you'd actually have to use 2 refraction components, as the ray gets bent twice while passing the water/air and air/water boundaries. The problem is the first refraction where the ray passes from water into air: The refraction component doesn't allow for this case, where a ray passes from a material with a higher IOR to a material with a lower IOR (there is no negative range on the refraction slider). Maybe this can be faked with offsets though, I'm not sure. --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||
Posted: May 24, 2007 8:07 am | ||||||
StevieJ
![]() |
Having some luck blending bubbles with noise scratches before refraction....
Thanx for the time of day ![]() Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||||
Posted: May 24, 2007 11:55 am | ||||||
Redcap
![]() |
I am sorry to say this, but I have to say this filter is awful. It is too creative, too useful for different applications, too original, to ... well good. You make all my filters look like garbage.
Stop producing so many good filters. ![]() |
|||||
Posted: May 24, 2007 1:27 pm | ||||||
Kraellin
![]() |
i know i'm going to hate myself for asking, but what is 'IOR', dilla? and if you use 16 highly technical terms to define this one, i'm going to dunk you in your own tank
![]() If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||||
Posted: May 24, 2007 2:39 pm | ||||||
Zephos
![]() |
^_^ I'd imagine it stands for Index of Refraction -- accidentally picked that up when I wrote the description about Shoujo Strands (Something about anime girl hair having a refractive index of three billion or something ^_^)... well, that or Irregular Orange Rotisserie, ahaha. Actually, it's pretty remarkable that you consider all that when creating your filters Crapadilla, quite amazing I must say!
Oh yes! Now the fun part: Index of Refraction -Zephos |
|||||
Posted: May 24, 2007 8:42 pm | ||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
Yup. I bet there is a solution that is artistically pleasing and visually correct despite the refraction component's limitations... --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||
Posted: May 25, 2007 6:09 am | ||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
I should warn you, my internet sarcasm detector malfunctions every now and then. ![]() ![]() Did I type anything? ![]() --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||
Posted: May 25, 2007 6:19 am | ||||||
MeKenzie
![]() |
Wow!
![]() Now can I puh-leeeease have some of your creative juicy in order to get a free FF? ~*~Dm7~*~ |
|||||
Posted: May 25, 2007 7:38 am | ||||||
Kraellin
![]() |
dilla,
wouldnt there be no negative index possible since that would require that light actually speed up again? If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||||
Posted: May 25, 2007 9:57 pm | ||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
If I understand correctly, a negative refraction value (on the component parameter that is, not a negative IOR) would just mean the ray gets bent the 'other' direction. If you look up the refraction indices for water > air and enter them into the formula provided on the refraction component help page, you'd end up with a negative ratio. Hence it is stated there that this case is not supported.
--- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||
Posted: May 26, 2007 7:01 am | ||||||
Kraellin
![]() |
ah, ok. you're talking about re-directing. ok. that works for me.
If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||||
Posted: May 26, 2007 12:59 pm | ||||||
James |
Great filter
![]() |
|||||
Posted: May 26, 2007 2:38 pm | ||||||
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator |
Absolutely fantastic. Definitely an Editor's Pick.
(I wish we could include the screaming face on the preview page ![]() |
|||||
Posted: June 14, 2007 11:06 am | ||||||
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator |
I can't say it's fast though. The speed can be improved by removing the chained Refraction components -- remember, each Refraction triples the sample count, so two Refractions chained together would produce 9 outgoing samples per one incoming sample.
I'd fix this by removing one of the Refractions and combining the scratches and droplets before feeding them into the remaining Refraction. Something like this (just a rough modification, the Scratches slider should be redone): Shark Tank! VG.ffxml |
|||||
Posted: June 14, 2007 11:17 am | ||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
Good point. Update coming soon...
![]() Edit: Just did a speed comparison on the default preset Old version (2 Refraction components): 1m 25s New version (1 Refraction component): 1m 24s hmmmm... ![]() This is the edited version... Shark Tank!.ffxml --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||
Posted: June 14, 2007 12:02 pm | ||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
You could, if there was a filter gallery with preview thumbs on the main filter page... ![]() --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||
Posted: June 14, 2007 12:57 pm | ||||||
StevieJ
![]() |
Congrats Dilla!!!
![]() Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||||
Posted: June 14, 2007 3:47 pm | ||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
Just did another render test and it seems that the library version is actually the fastest.
![]() Also - it seems - the value of the Refraction parameter has a huge influence on render time... --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||
Posted: June 15, 2007 4:21 am | ||||||
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator |
This might be due to the fact that the large refraction values increase the sample spread, which in turn causes more Blur blocks to be rendered, thus increasing the rendering time. |
|||||
Posted: June 15, 2007 4:58 am | ||||||
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator |
My numbers (on a single-core P4): Library version: 3 min 24 sec My modification: 3 min 2 sec Your modification: 3 min 54 sec |
|||||
Posted: June 15, 2007 5:25 am | ||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
My new numbers (Dual-Core P4)
Library version: 1m 19s Vlad's modification*: 1m 23s Dilla's modification: 1m 25s * but with Refraction value set to 25 as in the other versions! This is important for the look of the condensation. ![]() --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||
Posted: June 15, 2007 5:33 am | ||||||
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator |
||||||
Posted: June 15, 2007 8:41 am | ||||||
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator |
||||||
Posted: June 15, 2007 8:42 am | ||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
I've been wondering about these black spots as well, because they aren't too pretty. Seems like the Refraction wraps around on the edges, which in this case, I don't like too much.
![]() --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||
Posted: June 16, 2007 7:03 am | ||||||
ronviers
![]() |
I just finished an underwater filter. Before I submitted it I decided to check the FF library to see how redundant it would be. I never check the library in advance because it takes the wind out of my sails. Anyway, that’s when I found your ‘Shark Tank!’ filter. Man is it unbelievable, after just finishing a water filter I am in a position to appreciate how nice it is. It makes mine look awful. I submitted mine anyway but I am sure glad I did not find yours before I started.
Nice job ![]() I just finished mine minutes ago and I feel like a zombie. The amount of concentration these things require is amazing. ![]() @ronviers |
|||||
Posted: June 17, 2007 12:13 am | ||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
I feel quite the opposite about this: It's an incentive to surpass! ![]()
I certainly wouldn't want to be the one discouraging anyone from filter authoring... ![]() --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||
Posted: June 18, 2007 6:46 am | ||||||
ronviers
![]() |
Loners and leaders... ![]() The important thing is that I realize that you have set the bar very high and have inspired me to surpass myself. @ronviers |
|||||
Posted: June 18, 2007 7:02 am | ||||||
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator |
No, it doesn't. The spots are caused by the gradient -- which does. |
|||||
Posted: June 19, 2007 6:26 am | ||||||
Redcap
![]() |
Alright, we all saw this coming but Shark Tank has reached HU! Yeahh!!!! Congratulations on yet another great filter.
|
|||||
Posted: July 9, 2007 5:56 pm | ||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
Who would've thought there are so many would-be villains furnishing their secret hideouts, eh?
![]() ![]() ![]() --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||
Posted: July 10, 2007 5:33 am | ||||||
ionic69
![]() |
oh my god, crapadilla, this is over the top
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||
Posted: July 22, 2007 9:38 pm | ||||||
StevieJ
![]() |
Hey, where's the blood???
![]() ![]() Totally cool ![]() Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||||
Posted: July 22, 2007 10:13 pm | ||||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
Just a profile gradient and two color controls. ![]() --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||||
Posted: July 23, 2007 4:21 am | ||||||
Kraellin
![]() |
ummm, wouldnt it be lighter at the top and darker at the bottom? though, i suppose if you were in the water with a light or behind a glass that had light, this might be right.
regardless, nice image, dilla ![]() ![]() If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||||
Posted: July 23, 2007 3:34 pm |
Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!
33,711 Registered Users
+18 new in 30 days!
153,531 Posts
+36 new in 30 days!
15,347 Topics
+72 new in year!
20 unregistered users.