YOUR ACCOUNT

Messages 1 - 45 of 61
First | Prev. | 1 2 | Next | Last 
Login or Register to post new topics or replies
StevieJ
Designer/Artist

Posts: 11264
Filters: 163
Shark Tank! by Crapadilla
http://www.filterforge.com/filters/2853.html

Steve

"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :)
  Details E-Mail
StevieJ
Designer/Artist

Posts: 11264
Filters: 163
The depth submerged in water is perfect!!! Excellent work!!!

I can't wait for the day that I'm able to create anything I can envision like you....

You definitely have achieved world.....errr.....filter library domination smile:D LOL....

"It's good to be the king" eh??? smile:) smile:) smile:)
Steve

"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :)
  Details E-Mail
Rawn (RawArt)
Texture Artist

Posts: 812
Filters: 105
A-there's a tugboat … huh, huh, huh … down by the river don’tcha know
Where a cement bag’s just a'droopin' on down
Oh, that cement is just, it's there for the weight, dear
Five'll get ya ten old Macky’s back in town.



Totally cool!



  Details E-Mail
voldemort
voldemort
Posts: 872
Filters: 649
Sweet its finally here smile:D
lets all whine for a wine port
  Details E-Mail
StevieJ
Designer/Artist

Posts: 11264
Filters: 163
Rawn, cool pic!!! smile:)
Steve

"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :)
  Details E-Mail
Presidio
Presidio

Posts: 2915
Filters: 43
Love the fitler----> Grapping a copy now~ smile:D smile:D smile:D

Beautiful work Crapadilla!!~



  Details E-Mail
Kraellin
Kraellin

Posts: 12749
Filters: 99
hehe, nice one, rawn smile:)
If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!

Craig
  Details E-Mail
Torley
Second Lifer

Posts: 303
Liquidy! OMG, another smash hit from the most antithetical name ever, "Crapadilla". I've gotta apply this to some Second Life pictures and see what transpires.

Rawn, that looks so freaky, like outta some kinda horror freakshow!
I'm enjoying using Filter Forge to create http://torley.com/textures
  Details E-Mail
Crapadilla
lvl 52 Filter Weaver and Official "Filter Forge Seer"

Posts: 4365
Filters: 65
Thanks all!

Let me know if you got any ideas to make it even better! smile:D
--- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;)
  Details E-Mail
Zephos
Xyni says "Maximum w00tness!"

Posts: 304
Filters: 31
It's out! It's out! Happy, happy! *Downloads!* ^_^ Glad to see Shark Tank finally released in it's gone gold glory and it looks absolutely breath taking -- more less literally, ahahaha ^_~! You've outdone yourself on this filter along with Cartography Crapadilla! Outstanding work!

The only thing I could think of adding would be in tank air bubbles (You know, like from stuff drowning) -- well, that or actual sharks, ahahah, although definitely not necessary as doing something like that would be enough to cover it's own filter ^_-
-Zephos
  Details E-Mail
StevieJ
Designer/Artist

Posts: 11264
Filters: 163
Quote
Zephos wrote:
The only thing I could think of adding would be in tank air bubbles

Yeah, I'd like to see that too smile;)

I'm trying to do something similar.....embed the random-shaped and elongated bubbles of my "WetGlassExtreme" to look like they have more depth inside the glass....

Did you get my email??? smile:)
Steve

"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :)
  Details E-Mail
Crapadilla
lvl 52 Filter Weaver and Official "Filter Forge Seer"

Posts: 4365
Filters: 65
Quote
Zephos wrote:
The only thing I could think of adding would be in tank air bubbles


Yup, thought about that, but to this end my experiments with the refraction component have been unsatisfactory so far.

To faithfully reproduce air bubbles underwater you'd actually have to use 2 refraction components, as the ray gets bent twice while passing the water/air and air/water boundaries. The problem is the first refraction where the ray passes from water into air: The refraction component doesn't allow for this case, where a ray passes from a material with a higher IOR to a material with a lower IOR (there is no negative range on the refraction slider).

Maybe this can be faked with offsets though, I'm not sure.
--- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;)
  Details E-Mail
StevieJ
Designer/Artist

Posts: 11264
Filters: 163
Having some luck blending bubbles with noise scratches before refraction....

Thanx for the time of day smile;) LOL....
Steve

"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :)
  Details E-Mail
Redcap
Redcap

Posts: 1290
Filters: 100
I am sorry to say this, but I have to say this filter is awful. It is too creative, too useful for different applications, too original, to ... well good. You make all my filters look like garbage.

Stop producing so many good filters. smile;)



If you are bored check out my unpractical math website
  Details E-Mail
Kraellin
Kraellin

Posts: 12749
Filters: 99
i know i'm going to hate myself for asking, but what is 'IOR', dilla? and if you use 16 highly technical terms to define this one, i'm going to dunk you in your own tank smile;)
If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!

Craig
  Details E-Mail
Zephos
Xyni says "Maximum w00tness!"

Posts: 304
Filters: 31
^_^ I'd imagine it stands for Index of Refraction -- accidentally picked that up when I wrote the description about Shoujo Strands (Something about anime girl hair having a refractive index of three billion or something ^_^)... well, that or Irregular Orange Rotisserie, ahaha. Actually, it's pretty remarkable that you consider all that when creating your filters Crapadilla, quite amazing I must say!

Oh yes! Now the fun part:

Index of Refraction
-Zephos
  Details E-Mail
Crapadilla
lvl 52 Filter Weaver and Official "Filter Forge Seer"

Posts: 4365
Filters: 65
Quote
StevieJ wrote:
Having some luck blending bubbles with noise scratches before refraction....


Yup. I bet there is a solution that is artistically pleasing and visually correct despite the refraction component's limitations...
--- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;)
  Details E-Mail
Crapadilla
lvl 52 Filter Weaver and Official "Filter Forge Seer"

Posts: 4365
Filters: 65
Quote
Redcap wrote:
I am sorry to say this, but I have to say this filter is awful. It is too creative, too useful for different applications, too original, to ... well good. You make all my filters look like garbage.


I should warn you, my internet sarcasm detector malfunctions every now and then. smile;) smile:D

Did I type anything? smile:?:
--- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;)
  Details E-Mail
MeKenzie
Freelancer

Posts: 56
Filters: 3
Wow! smile:eek: I'm betting that it's going to be one of those most popular filters out there! Very original and creative!

Now can I puh-leeeease have some of your creative juicy in order to get a free FF?
~*~Dm7~*~
  Details E-Mail
Kraellin
Kraellin

Posts: 12749
Filters: 99
dilla,

wouldnt there be no negative index possible since that would require that light actually speed up again?
If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!

Craig
  Details E-Mail
Crapadilla
lvl 52 Filter Weaver and Official "Filter Forge Seer"

Posts: 4365
Filters: 65
If I understand correctly, a negative refraction value (on the component parameter that is, not a negative IOR) would just mean the ray gets bent the 'other' direction. If you look up the refraction indices for water > air and enter them into the formula provided on the refraction component help page, you'd end up with a negative ratio. Hence it is stated there that this case is not supported.
--- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;)
  Details E-Mail
Kraellin
Kraellin

Posts: 12749
Filters: 99
ah, ok. you're talking about re-directing. ok. that works for me.
If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!

Craig
  Details E-Mail
James
James
Posts: 676
Filters: 46
Great filter smile:)
  Details E-Mail
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator
Posts: 3446
Filters: 55
Absolutely fantastic. Definitely an Editor's Pick.
(I wish we could include the screaming face on the preview page smile:) )
  Details E-Mail
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator
Posts: 3446
Filters: 55
I can't say it's fast though. The speed can be improved by removing the chained Refraction components -- remember, each Refraction triples the sample count, so two Refractions chained together would produce 9 outgoing samples per one incoming sample.

I'd fix this by removing one of the Refractions and combining the scratches and droplets before feeding them into the remaining Refraction.

Something like this (just a rough modification, the Scratches slider should be redone):

Shark Tank! VG.ffxml
  Details E-Mail
Crapadilla
lvl 52 Filter Weaver and Official "Filter Forge Seer"

Posts: 4365
Filters: 65
Good point. Update coming soon... smile;)



Edit: Just did a speed comparison on the default preset

Old version (2 Refraction components): 1m 25s
New version (1 Refraction component): 1m 24s

hmmmm... smile:D

This is the edited version...

Shark Tank!.ffxml
--- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;)
  Details E-Mail
Crapadilla
lvl 52 Filter Weaver and Official "Filter Forge Seer"

Posts: 4365
Filters: 65
Quote
Vladimir Golovin wrote:
(I wish we could include the screaming face on the preview page Smile )


You could, if there was a filter gallery with preview thumbs on the main filter page... smile;)
--- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;)
  Details E-Mail
StevieJ
Designer/Artist

Posts: 11264
Filters: 163
Congrats Dilla!!! smile:)
Steve

"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :)
  Details E-Mail
Crapadilla
lvl 52 Filter Weaver and Official "Filter Forge Seer"

Posts: 4365
Filters: 65
Just did another render test and it seems that the library version is actually the fastest. smile:D

Also - it seems - the value of the Refraction parameter has a huge influence on render time...
--- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;)
  Details E-Mail
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator
Posts: 3446
Filters: 55
Quote
Crapadilla wrote:
the value of the Refraction parameter has a huge influence on render time

This might be due to the fact that the large refraction values increase the sample spread, which in turn causes more Blur blocks to be rendered, thus increasing the rendering time.
  Details E-Mail
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator
Posts: 3446
Filters: 55
Quote
Crapadilla wrote:
library version is actually the fastest


My numbers (on a single-core P4):

Library version: 3 min 24 sec
My modification: 3 min 2 sec
Your modification: 3 min 54 sec
  Details E-Mail
Crapadilla
lvl 52 Filter Weaver and Official "Filter Forge Seer"

Posts: 4365
Filters: 65
My new numbers (Dual-Core P4)

Library version: 1m 19s
Vlad's modification*: 1m 23s
Dilla's modification: 1m 25s

* but with Refraction value set to 25 as in the other versions! This is important for the look of the condensation. smile:devil:
--- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;)
  Details E-Mail
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator
Posts: 3446
Filters: 55
Hehe, let's just leave the refraction as it is now smile:D

Another possible modification: it can be made seamless. This also reduces the black spots near the top edge of the image:

  Details E-Mail
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator
Posts: 3446
Filters: 55
Here's the filter:

Shark Tank Seamless.ffxml
  Details E-Mail
Crapadilla
lvl 52 Filter Weaver and Official "Filter Forge Seer"

Posts: 4365
Filters: 65
I've been wondering about these black spots as well, because they aren't too pretty. Seems like the Refraction wraps around on the edges, which in this case, I don't like too much. smile:evil:
--- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;)
  Details E-Mail
ronviers
lighter/generalist

Posts: 4456
Filters: 35
I just finished an underwater filter. Before I submitted it I decided to check the FF library to see how redundant it would be. I never check the library in advance because it takes the wind out of my sails. Anyway, that’s when I found your ‘Shark Tank!’ filter. Man is it unbelievable, after just finishing a water filter I am in a position to appreciate how nice it is. It makes mine look awful. I submitted mine anyway but I am sure glad I did not find yours before I started.

Nice job smile:D

I just finished mine minutes ago and I feel like a zombie. The amount of concentration these things require is amazing.
smile:dead:
@ronviers
  Details E-Mail
Crapadilla
lvl 52 Filter Weaver and Official "Filter Forge Seer"

Posts: 4365
Filters: 65
Quote
ronviers wrote:
I never check the library in advance because it takes the wind out of my sails.


I feel quite the opposite about this: It's an incentive to surpass! smile;)

Quote
ronviers wrote:
I submitted mine anyway but I am sure glad I did not find yours before I started.


I certainly wouldn't want to be the one discouraging anyone from filter authoring... smile:D
--- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;)
  Details E-Mail
ronviers
lighter/generalist

Posts: 4456
Filters: 35
Quote
I feel quite the opposite about this: It's an incentive to surpass! Wink


Loners and leaders... smile:)

The important thing is that I realize that you have set the bar very high and have inspired me to surpass myself.
@ronviers
  Details E-Mail
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator
Posts: 3446
Filters: 55
Quote
Crapadilla wrote:
Seems like the Refraction wraps around on the edges


No, it doesn't. The spots are caused by the gradient -- which does.
  Details E-Mail
Redcap
Redcap

Posts: 1290
Filters: 100
Alright, we all saw this coming but Shark Tank has reached HU! Yeahh!!!! Congratulations on yet another great filter.



If you are bored check out my unpractical math website
  Details E-Mail
Crapadilla
lvl 52 Filter Weaver and Official "Filter Forge Seer"

Posts: 4365
Filters: 65
Who would've thought there are so many would-be villains furnishing their secret hideouts, eh? smile;) smile:D

--- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;)
  Details E-Mail
ionic69

Posts: 24
Filters: 4
oh my god, crapadilla, this is over the top smile:) so simple and yet sooooooo unusually live and warm smile:) is there some kind of invisible "emotion" node you are connecting to your filters? smile:) just wow smile:)
  Details E-Mail
StevieJ
Designer/Artist

Posts: 11264
Filters: 163
Hey, where's the blood??? smile;) smile:D LOL....

Totally cool smile8)
Steve

"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :)
  Details E-Mail
Crapadilla
lvl 52 Filter Weaver and Official "Filter Forge Seer"

Posts: 4365
Filters: 65
Quote
ionic69 wrote:
is there some kind of invisible "emotion" node you are connecting to your filters?


Just a profile gradient and two color controls. smile;)
--- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;)
  Details E-Mail
Kraellin
Kraellin

Posts: 12749
Filters: 99
ummm, wouldnt it be lighter at the top and darker at the bottom? though, i suppose if you were in the water with a light or behind a glass that had light, this might be right.

regardless, nice image, dilla smile:) (btw, sharks are old hat for villain hq's. i think sea bass is the new 'shark' smile:) ).
If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!

Craig
  Details E-Mail

Messages 1 - 45 of 61
First | Prev. | 1 2 | Next | Last 

Join Our Community!

Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!

33,711 Registered Users
+18 new in 30 days!

153,531 Posts
+36 new in 30 days!

15,347 Topics
+72 new in year!

Create an Account

Online Users Last minute:

20 unregistered users.