SpaceRay
![]() |
Before there was cool and very interesting challenges to be able to make awesome and difficult things with Filter Forge (FF) and mainly uberzev and ThreeDee suggested to make many of these challenges with amazing and beautiful results
Hyperbolic Tiling Challenge Cube / Isometric Challenges Wireframe Sphere Challenge Fractal Tessellation Challenge Gosper Island Challenge All these ones are from nearly a year ago, and since then it seems that there has been very little new challenges. Does anyone want to suggest or make any new FF filter challenge? here are some more challenges from a forum search |
|||||||||
Posted: July 19, 2013 1:09 pm | ||||||||||
Skybase
![]() |
You should start a challenge yourself, and contribute to this forum by also doing the challenge you set forth. I'd gladly follow you up on that. Otherwise if you got nothing, I got tons of nasty challenges I've tried myself but failed which can easily be new challenges for others.
|
|||||||||
Posted: July 19, 2013 2:16 pm | ||||||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
If I had an idea for a new challenge I would have already done it, and would like much to make it also myself, but I am not still enough FF skilled (still learning) for any complex challenge like the ones that have been already suggested before.
Well, if you have got a lot of ideas for challenges, you can suggest them, as you have said in another thread, no one is forced to make them, and anyone that wants to make them and feel inspired and confident that he or she could do it, would be good to see what happens. |
|||||||||
Posted: July 20, 2013 1:44 am | ||||||||||
Skybase
![]() |
Right right, I understand where you are with your levels. I'm more saying you should make a challenge on your level. Even stuff like make 7 fun designs in 7 days is a fun challenge. Or make 10 simple textures in a month is a great challenge to pick up and try. Those challenges you've linked are exceptional. I suspect only 10% or 20% of the community to even be able to engage in them. Which is why they're impressive but they're quite reserved.
It's a bit idealist but I'd rather have a challenge where anybody can engage in them. People typically would just leave praise and stuff but what counts more is somebody at least trying to construct themselves a solution to that challenge. As an author, I sometimes feel like what I leave around just gets leeched off like items on a supermarket shelf. I'm sure people are better than that, but my point is that I don't want a challenge where nobody does nothing. I prefer to see effort made together as a group than 1 person trying everything. Sure we all have agendas in our lives and our personal problems but that's what a forum is, anybody can contribute material if it suits the topic. But like I say, that's kinda ideal. In the end people are gonna be people so I don't expect anybody to be on the same page with me. And sure! I had a couple ideas for a challenge which others will totally be able to join. But I really don't want it to just become "Oh hey pretty filters... here are some example pictures." ![]() ye? ![]() ![]() [Edit] Clarified some points. |
|||||||||
Posted: July 20, 2013 4:37 am | ||||||||||
ThreeDee
![]() |
I just suggested this in another thread, maybe not the simplest of challenges, but here we go:
Make a flexible-layout filter that retains certain elements at a specific pixel size regardless of image dimensions. One example comes to mind: A ruler filter (or snippet) which measures the actual pixels of the image, like Photoshop rulers. Or it could be something else that demonstrates a similar idea in a workable fashion. Hint: Ken's image embedding filter comes in handy for including pixel images. |
|||||||||
Posted: July 20, 2013 11:51 am | ||||||||||
ThreeDee
![]() |
![]() ![]() A side note: I occasionally check the "Feature Request" threads to see if there is something that could be done with the existing tools. These could be used as challenges, too. |
|||||||||
Posted: July 20, 2013 11:58 am | ||||||||||
Skybase
![]() |
You sir, have set for quite a challenge.
![]() |
|||||||||
Posted: July 20, 2013 12:13 pm | ||||||||||
Juliusz_K
Posts: 3 |
Hey,
How about more texture oriented contest. Not so technical, like the previous ones, but something where the eye for colours and material would be as important. Technical advancement would still help, of course. An example: A snowy roof texture. A texture of a roof with a slider for the level of "snowiness" - the snow would appear with respect to the slates/tiles shapes. Something along these lines: http://www.flickr.com/photos/cienne/4...249228003/ or this: http://www.bestourism.com/img/items/b..._15860.jpg As you can see, when the snow starts to melt, it starts from the top, remaining for the longest time at the bottom section. The shape of tiles/slates would be up to the author. And the more control over the way snow appears/dissapears the better. Or another idea - copy a photgraph based texture as close as possible. Examples: http://www.cgtextures.com/texview.php...0cu992h021 http://www.cgtextures.com/texview.php...0cu992h021 http://www.cgtextures.com/texview.php...0cu992h021 The one who's able to mimic the texture closest to the photograph wins. Feel free to come up with some other examples. But the general idea is to get some useful stuff as a result. |
|||||||||
Posted: July 23, 2013 6:23 pm | ||||||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
Coming from this other thread following suggestions of Skybase and ThreeDee
Suggest a new filter (scroll up from this link to see the below texts)
Yes, I agree that using difference mode is not the right way to do it and does not give good colors and are uncontrolled, and as Skybase has shown in another filter, I agree with you that the best way could probably be apply color via elevation gradient.
YES, I agree with you and also think that this has been built by hand in Illustrator (or similar vector software) that is easy to make and fill the shapes with the colors you want easily, but this would give you just one and only version, and this is why I thought that maybe if this could be done in FF you could make variable elipses number and size and multiple them and be able to fill the shapes with different colors and even with bits and parts of photos sources. |
|||||||||
Posted: August 7, 2013 3:18 am | ||||||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
I think I have another possible challenge coming from the image shown in the home page of filter forge
It could be good to be able to have about 5 or 10 color controls to load your own images or photos and if wanted add to them a simple frame and scatter them as shown in the image below, and should have a drop shadow in each one The problem I see with this is that in Bomber there is no spacing control or feature to control the images so I do not know if this would be possible to make or not. Other problem would be to make them shown in perspective like the image below, BUT I think that it would not be needed to do it inside in FF, you could make it flat 2D inside FF in frontal view, and then take it into Photoshop (or any software that could do 3D transformations) and give very easily the perspective. I have just tested and have done a filter that can resize and put an image inside a frame WITHOUT cropping and loosing any part of the photo or image as it happens in some frame filters, so this is not a problem. |
|||||||||
Posted: December 6, 2013 4:19 am | ||||||||||
Skybase
![]() |
That's kinda vague.... Wait so you managed to get the aspect ratio of an image from color control input? |
|||||||||
Posted: December 6, 2013 9:01 am | ||||||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
Sorry that I may have explained wrong, I have seen on some FF filters that make a frame, that this frame is OVER the original source image and will COVER part of the original source image, so it will be cropped and you will be loosing a part of the original image, so the original image is NOT included inside the frame, is like the frame is "glued" over the original image For example ![]() Here you can see that the Lifesaver image is NOT the full one and has been cut and cropped when using this polaroid frame. Here is another example ![]() Well in my frame filter you can resize the frame and the original image will NOT be cut at all and will be FULLY included inside the new created frame, and nothing of it will be lost I was going to submit my frame filter but I had a problem with a feature I want to add, and I could not do it yet. |
|||||||||
Posted: December 7, 2013 6:58 am | ||||||||||
Skybase
![]() |
Oh right. Yeah, that's a nice touch on frame filters, it's always been a mild thing I thought around. I mean I can image what you did / how it works and so on based on what you're discussing. I guess that's a nice beginner mini challenge and again a nice touch on frame filters. Numerous ways of achieving the result and it's probably something easily managed.
The real challenge is what you said:
The frame component or any proportional gradient works based on what the canvas is scaled at, so much of the job's done for you when you import an image. The tricky part is with color controls, they don't come with everything you need to make frames directly as you'd get with 1 image. Soooo that's the fun part. ![]() Again, this sort of thing is clearly something you do outside of FF. The program was obviously not built for it. You already mentioned that thought. But then again it seems more doable than I'm imagining. |
|||||||||
Posted: December 7, 2013 7:46 am | ||||||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
2 years after the last post, I want to make the same question of the title, now that there are new and experienced filter forgers that make cool, artistic and interesting things, like for example Rick Duim and Ramlyn
|
|||||||||
Posted: November 14, 2015 2:23 am |
Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!
33,711 Registered Users
+18 new in 30 days!
153,533 Posts
+38 new in 30 days!
15,348 Topics
+73 new in year!
12 unregistered users.